The statement which states the Aztecs as brilliant builders can probably best describe the Aztecs.
Explanation:
- The Aztecs were very intelligent and scientific. They had knowledge of mathematics and science. The archaeological evidence unearthed has also shown records of the Aztec's excellent scientific minds.
- The temples that have been uncovered by archaeologists suggest it is open evidence for their magnificent temples. The strong structure and beautiful architecture suggest their love for the science of buildings.
- The Aztecs also build magnificent city's and laid out the structure of the huts in the city in an amazing pattern. The engineering of the building that the Aztecs mastered at that time indeed labels them as brilliant builders.
Answer: The battle of Jacinto
Explanation: it was the final battle of the Texas revolution and it resulted in the defeat of the Mexican army and independence for Texas
The chief tactic that the As- syrians used to maintain tranquility in their empire was terror
The Old French word tranquility, which initially intended "peace" or "happy," is where the word serenity gets its origin. However, the meaning of the phrase didn't fully develop until the late 14th century.
The attribute or state of becoming tranquil, that is, peaceful, tranquil, and worry-free, is called tranquility (also written tranquility). The term "tranquility" can be found in a wide variety of texts, from Buddhist religious writings where the term "passaddhi" refers to mental, physical, and spiritual tranquility on the road to enlightenment to a variety of policy and strategy guidance documents where the word is typically interpreted in relation to interaction with the natural globe. The phrase "ensure domestic Tranquility" is widely used in the Preamble of the US Constitution.
To learn more about tranquility here
brainly.com/question/8274114
#SPJ4
I can’t see any possible options but secondary sources and online sources should be double checked and avoided if possible. few secondary sources are trustworthy like textbooks
TRANSLATED ANSWER :explain how the process of the earthen enclosures in England influenced the English revolutionary process during the seventeenth century : ANSWER : Enclosure (sometimes inclosure) was the legal process in England of consolidating (enclosing) small landholdings into larger farms.[1] Once enclosed, use of the land became restricted to the owner, and it ceased to be common land for communal use. In England and Wales the term is also used for the process that ended the ancient system of arable farming in open fields. Under enclosure, such land is fenced (enclosed) and deeded or entitled to one or more owners. The process of enclosure began to be a widespread feature of the English agricultural landscape during the 16th century. By the 19th century, unenclosed commons had become largely restricted to rough pasture in mountainous areas and to relatively small parts of the lowlands.
Enclosure could be accomplished by buying the ground rights and all common rights to accomplish exclusive rights of use, which increased the value of the land. The other method was by passing laws causing or forcing enclosure, such as Parliamentary enclosure involving an Inclosure Act. The latter process of enclosure was sometimes accompanied by force, resistance, and bloodshed, and remains among the most controversial areas of agricultural and economic history in England. Marxist and neo-Marxist historians argue that rich landowners used their control of state processes to appropriate public land for their private benefit.[2][better source needed] During the Georgian era, the process of enclosure created a landless working class that provided the labour required in the new industries developing in the north of England. For example: "In agriculture the years between 1760 and 1820 are the years of wholesale enclosure in which, in village after village, common rights are lost".[3] E. P. Thompson argues that "Enclosure (when all the sophistications are allowed for) was a plain enough case of class robbery."[4][5]
W. A. Armstrong, among others, argued that this is perhaps an oversimplification, that the better-off members of the European peasantry encouraged and participated actively in enclosure, seeking to end the perpetual poverty of subsistence farming. "We should be careful not to ascribe to [enclosure] developments that were the consequence of a much broader and more complex process of historical change."[6] "The impact of eighteenth and nineteenth century enclosure has been grossly exaggerated ..."[7][8]
Enclosure is considered one of the causes of the British Agricultural Revolution. Enclosed land was under control of the farmer who was free to adopt better farming practices. There was widespread agreement in contemporary accounts that profit making opportunities were better with enclosed land.[9] Following enclosure, crop yields increased while at the same time labour productivity increased enough to create a surplus of labour. The increased labour supply is considered one of the causes of the Industrial Revolution.[10] Marx argued in Capital that enclosure played a constitutive role in the revolutionary transformation of feudalism into capitalism, both by transforming land from a means of subsistence into a means to realize profit on commodity markets (primarily wool in the English case), and by creating the conditions for the modern labour market by transforming small peasant proprietors and serfs into agricultural wage-labourers, whose opportunities to exit the market declined as the common lands were enclosed.
