There's not just one "thesis statement" and "argument" for <span>cubist style of art. </span><span> There's a veritable infinity of approaches you can take here. </span>The traditional stance is that <span>cubist style of art </span><span>revolutionized European painting and sculpture, and that it was a part of the avant-garde art movement. </span>One less traditional stance would be that<span> cubist style of art</span><span> was essentially a creative cul de sac that didn't contribute anything lasting to European painting and sculpture. </span> Here's one thesis statement: "<span>Cubist style of art</span> - a pre-WWII style that still thrives today" Hope it helps
