Well sin is sin regardless of who does it, the way it is done, or who acknowledges. If you are a person who believe in sin than it is best for your conscious to be attuned to sin ( so you can recognise it and make changes) But for just every day people we all sin and while we may not count every sin we should always strive for self control. For people who don't know what they are doing is sin- it is still sin. God may judge that person differently than one is very aware of sin ( and held more accountable)
Please vote my answer brainliest. thanks!
Performance threat is a situation in which something is obviously wrong or has the potential to go wrong.
Answer: Inca
The Incas were one of the most civilized peoples in America. They comprised mainly the Quechua, Aymará, Yunka, etc. tribes, which, according to the Spanish, formed the Empire of the Incas, a name derived from the reigning family belonging to the Quechua tribe, the main of the empire.
The Inca culture has been totally destroyed and today only ruins of its grand monuments, temples and palaces remain.
A newspaper office runs smoothly because each employee has a specific job that leads to newspapers being printed and distributed. emile durkheim would call this organic solidarity.
Organic solidarity is based on the premise that individuals can collectively mix and live together in society. It is contrasted by mechanical solidarity, which often refers to pre-industrialized social settings, whereby communities were mostly isolated and had homogeneous social traits.
Émile Durkheim's Organic Solidarity is a theory that explains how we work together, we divide work and how this causes us to depend on each other. An example is when in a school sale some are responsible for making the product, perhaps cupcakes, others to buy the ingredients to make them, other students sell them and others charge them. To do the job completely, we must depend on others and work in solidarity.
Learn more about Émile Durkheim:
brainly.com/question/5131392
#SPJ4
Answer:
It strengthened the role of the judicial branch of government.
It affirmed the principle of judicial review.
Explanation:
The famous case of Marbury v. Madison of 1803 resulted from the last-minute appointments- "midnight judges" by outgoing President John Adams mere hours before the succeeding president Thomas Jefferson comes to the office. This appointment resulted in the conflict of what power trumps the other.
President John Adams appointed William Marbury along with several others as justices of the peace hours before he was to step down as President. By the time the next president Jefferson came to office, the commission of Marbury along with some others was still left undelivered. Marbury then took the new Secretary of State John Marshall to court, asking for his commission to be delivered.
This resulted in the court deciding which power decides which fate, confirming the power of judicial review and strengthening the role of the judicial branch. The Supreme Court directed that if any act of Congress is in conflict with the interest of the Constitution, then it can annul any acts it deems unconstitutional.
Thus, the correct answers are the first and third options.
