1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Firlakuza [10]
3 years ago
5

What sparked off shays's rebellion?

History
2 answers:
Genrish500 [490]3 years ago
8 0

The Shay’s Rebellion started off when the US had been struggling after the depression and the lack of currencies and the harsh policies. This rebellion started in Massachusetts 1786-1787. The uprising was led by Daniel Shay, a Revolutionary War Veteran

Harman [31]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

c

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why did the Kingdom of Israel split?
scZoUnD [109]

Throughout their history in the Promised Land, the children of Israel struggled with conflict among the tribes. The disunity went back all the way to the patriarch Jacob, who presided over a house divided. The sons of Leah and the sons of Rachel had their share of contention even in Jacob’s lifetime (Genesis 37:1-11).


The enmity among the half-brothers continued in the time of the judges. Benjamin (one of Rachel’s tribes) took up arms against the other tribes (Judges 20). Israel’s first king, Saul, was of the tribe of Benjamin. When David was crowned king—David was from the tribe of Judah (one of Leah’s tribes)—the Benjamites rebelled (2 Samuel 2–3). After a long war (2 Samuel 3:1), David succeeded in uniting all twelve tribes (5:1-5).


The frailty of the union was exposed, however, when David’s son Absalom promoted himself as the new king and drew many Israelites away from their allegiance to David (2 Samuel 15). Significantly, Absalom set up his throne in Hebron, the site of the former capital (v. 10). A later revolt was led by a man named Sheba against David and the tribe of Judah (20:1-2).


The reign of David’s son Solomon saw more unrest when one of the king’s servants, Jeroboam, rebelled. Jeroboam was on the king’s errand when he met the prophet Ahijah, who told him that God was going to give him authority over ten of the twelve tribes of Israel. God’s reason for the division of the kingdom was definitive: “Because they have forsaken me . . . and have not walked in my ways.” However, God promised that David’s dynasty would continue, albeit over a much smaller kingdom, for the sake of God’s covenant with David and for the sake of Jerusalem, God’s chosen city. When Solomon learned of the prophecy, he sought to kill Jeroboam, who fled to Egypt for sanctuary (1 Kings 11:26-40).


After Solomon’s death, his son Rehoboam was set to become the next king. Jeroboam returned from Egypt and led a group of people to confront Rehoboam with a demand for a lighter tax burden. When Rehoboam refused the demand, ten of the tribes rejected Rehoboam and David’s dynasty (1 Kings 12:16), and Ahijah’s prophecy was fulfilled. Only Judah and Benjamin remained loyal to King Rehoboam. The northern tribes crowned Jeroboam as their king. Rehoboam made plans to mount an assault on the rebel tribes, but the Lord prevented him from taking that action (vv. 21-24). Meanwhile, Jeroboam further consolidated his power by instituting a form of calf worship unique to his kingdom and declaring that pilgrimages to Jerusalem were unnecessary. Thus, the people of the northern tribes would have no contact with the tribes of Judah and Benjamin.


“So Israel has been in rebellion against the house of David to this day” (1 Kings 12:19). The northern kingdom is called “Israel” (or sometimes “Ephraim”) in Scripture, and the southern kingdom is called “Judah.” From the divine viewpoint, the division was a judgment on not keeping God’s commands, specifically the commands prohibiting idolatry. From a human viewpoint, the division was the result of tribal discord and political unrest. The principle is that sin brings division (1 Corinthians 1:13, 11:18; James 4:1).


The good news is that God, in His mercy, has promised a reuniting of the northern and southern kingdoms. “He will raise a banner for the nations / and gather the exiles of Israel; / he will assemble the scattered people of Judah / from the four quarters of the earth. / Ephraim’s jealousy will vanish, / and Judah’s enemies will be destroyed; / Ephraim will not be jealous of Judah, / nor Judah hostile toward Ephraim” (Isaiah 11:12-13). When the Prince of Peace—Jesus Christ—reigns in His millennial kingdom, all hostility, jealousy, and conflict among the tribes will be put to rest.


4 0
3 years ago
Read this outline for an argumentative essay about government. 1. People have different ideas about the role of government. A. T
-Dominant- [34]

Hello. You forgot the answer options. The options are:

In the past, the military and the FBI have prevented a number of terrorist attacks.   I still remember how it felt on September 11 when our country was attacked by terrorists.   Social services cannot provide the sense of security that a strong national defense can.   Social services provide food, health care, and other forms of assistance to millions of citizens each year.

Answer:

In the past, the military and the FBI have prevented a number of terrorist attacks.  

Explanation:

The outline of the argumentative essay reveals that the essay has as its main theme the role of the government and government institutions in promoting the protection of the population against internal or external terrorist attacks. One way to add a detail that serves as an affirmation and evidence to this theme is showing how the government security agencies have already been efficient in promoting social security against terrorist and criminal attacks. One way to do this is to add the phrase "In the past, the military and the FBI have prevented a number of terrorist attacks."

4 0
3 years ago
In two or three paragraphs, compare and contrast the points of view of Wilson, Clemenceau, and Lloyd George at the Paris Peace C
Agata [3.3K]

Here is what i wrote for my essay:

World War I was settled by the victors at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919. The “Big Four,” who made all the major decisions, were President Woodrow Wilson of the United States, Prime Minister David Lloyd George of Great Britain, George Clemenceau of France, and of least importance, Italian Prime Minister Vittorio Orlando. Each major power had its own agenda coming to the Conference and not every aim was represented in the final treaties.


Wilson, Clemenceau, and Lloyd George all had different points of view at the Paris Peace Conference. For instance, lloyd George of Britain wanted to build a postwar Britain "fit for heroes". British aims at the conference were focused on securing France, settling territorial disputes, and maintaining their colonial holdings. Clemenceau of France wanted to weaken Germany so it could never threaten France. Having witnessed two German attacks on French soil in the last 40 years, France’s main concern was to ensure Germany would not be able to attack them again, so they pushed to weaken Germany militarily, strategically, and economically. Wilson of the U.S. wanted "peace without victory" with his fourteen points. The Americans’ vision was set out in Wilson’s Fourteen Points, which emphasized free trade, self-determination, and the founding of a League of Nations to support territorial and political independence of member nations.


PLEASE LIKE AND RATE MY ANSWER

4 0
3 years ago
In what ways do counties support state government
bulgar [2K]
Counties support the state government by using a Bicameral system creating to side branches such as the federal of state have, but this branch passes on laws that can be signed by other States giving them that thier state/counties are eligable to do what ever act the government has givien them, such as Formal President Barack Obama gave and signed the ObamaCare Act, and many States/Counties signed for as well. 
7 0
3 years ago
Can someone help please !!!
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]
I think it’s b.?????
7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 14. Explain the similarities between the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal Empire.
    12·1 answer
  • The legal term “indian country” includes:
    5·1 answer
  • Why do whites treat blacks diffrently and im not talking about all white people
    6·2 answers
  • The United States in 1800 had grown in what ways?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of these would most likely to be a loyalist in the revolutionary war
    10·1 answer
  • KriDeriu3Meganes
    10·1 answer
  • Which of these was a political goal for farmers?
    11·1 answer
  • In your opinion, was there any way for the colonies to make up with Great Britain? Could the Revolution have been avoided or was
    15·1 answer
  • At the Constitutional Convention, delegates wrote a new
    5·1 answer
  • When was the treaty of madrid?​
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!