Why did the inability of the Soviet economy to provide for the needs of its citizens lead to the collapse of the system during t
he Reagan administration? A.The vast size of the Soviet Union made it difficult to transport raw materials to isolated manufacturing centers.
B.Citizens who controlled local productivity found it difficult to compete in a global market, which led to many unused goods.
C.Economic control was concentrated at the top, which discouraged new technologies and innovations that could improve productivity.
D.Manufacturing centers were often stifled by the lack of resources and the shortage of labor in the Communist system
<span>B.Citizens who controlled local productivity found it difficult to compete in a global market, which led to many unused goods.
this is the closest of the 4
not A because: they still found a way to transport everything, (using rails and the like) and they wouldn't really be making nuclear weapons at that quick of a rate if their transportation was down. not C because: Sure, economic control was concentrated at the top, however, they did encourage technology (but only in the military and the like) So productivity was focused on military. Even if they produced things the general population can use, the military took a chunk out of it (that lead to shortages) not D because: the lands that the USSR was located in was pretty rich in mineral wealth and the like. They could mine out the minerals and use them (which beats down the "lack of resources" part.) Also, their population was the largest in the world (considering it had a bunch of countries together as one) and so there really wasn't a shortage of labor ( i mean, their army was also the largest in the world too...) This meant that they had more than enough people to be employed in the workforce, they just didn't use them wisely
Manchester's unplanned urbanisation was brought on by a boom in textile manufacture during the Industrial Revolution, and resulted in it becoming the world's first industrialised city. Manchester achieved city status in 1853.
First, they argued that the white Americans (and their black slaves) needed the land and could make better use of it. They argued that Americans could make the land more economically productive than the Indians had been able to. Second, the proponents argued from the idea of white superiority. They argued that the Indians were inferior and that it was not necessary to treat them fairly.
<span>Augustus created a system of government that survived for centuries. This is his greatest contribution because this gives Rome a stable empire to live on for a very long time. but this is an opinion</span>
