Answer:
Nomothetic approach
Explanation:
Professor Smith conceptualizes personality as a limited number of traits that everyone has to some degree. People can be compared on these traits—that is, some people may be high on one trait, some average, some low. As described in lecture, Professor Smith is using a <u>nomothetic </u>approach to personality.
Nomothetic approach to personality suggests that traits are responsible for peoples personalities.
Taking years as input variable and population of that city as output variable, let y represent the population after 1985 and y represent the population in and index of 1000. Linear regression is a modeling relationship that exists between the variable.
The equation, therefore, can be derived in Y=a+bX. In this case, Y is the independent variable that is drawn on the axis of the graph while X represents the variable plotted on the x-axis of the graph; finally, b is line slope.
God, if I could choose, I would say none. All of these lead to inequality (because circumstances vary between many individuals) but I believe prestige should hold the most weight in determining social class. Prestige (which is respect, recognition, or regard) is based on many criteria, including wealth, family background, fame, leadership, power, occupation, and accomplishments. Leadership, power, and accomplishments can both be achieved by any individual with hard work. This is still an unfair balance (gender inequality, racial/ethnical inequality/racism) because of individual factors, it still leaves hope for some people to rise the social ladder.
At first, the natives were glad to trade provisions to the colonists for metal tools, but by 1609 the English governor, John Smith, had begun to send raiding parties to demand food. This earned the colonists a bad reputation among the Native Americans and precipitated conflict.
Answer: A. Should be the answer.
Explanation:
