1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elden [556K]
2 years ago
12

To which factor can the principles of Nicholas Steno be applied

History
1 answer:
wel2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

i cant give you an answer because there is not enough info to give an answer

Explanation:

You might be interested in
After 20 years of US involvement in Vietnam many Americans agree with the counter culture and
kati45 [8]

Answer:

Began to question both the war and the fairness of the draft.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
How did the expansion of the Roman Republic affect small farmers?A Small farmers bought more land, allowing them to move into a
Gennadij [26K]
ANSWER:D
i took this the other day and wrote down the answers
5 0
3 years ago
The name of the city of St. Petersburg was changed following the Russian Revolution
alekssr [168]
<span>This is true. After the revolution the name was changed from St. Petersburg to Petrograd, which means Peter's city, and a bit later it was further changed into Leningrad. This was because the soviets wanted to completely secularize themselves and remove all figures that were related to the monarchy. In 1991 it changed its name back to St Petersburg.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
What was the effect of the Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison?
Sonbull [250]
In Marbury, the Supreme Courttook the power to declare that laws passed by Congress were null and void if they (in the Court'sopinion) violated the Constitution. The significance of Marbury v.Madison is that the ruling in thatcase gave the Supreme Court of the United States the power of judicial review.
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Evaluate the extent to which rulers of Indian states could exercise power independently from the British in the period 1750–1900
Leona [35]

Rulers of Indian states did not have autonomy under the British Rule.

Explanation:

The amount of power the ruler had over his dominion were nominal at best and their royalty was subject to the British as they could cite any reason and annex their land from them.

The amount of power the ruler had was also dependent on how closely the British were involved in their territory.

This was to be seen in places like Delhi and Calcutta where the British influence was more than in fringes  like Kerala and Orrissa where the King still had more power.

The power of the ruler was subject to the needs and interference of the British.

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/15650754#readmore

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please help..
    14·1 answer
  • A party formed mainly to fight the Democratic party and Andrew Jackson
    8·2 answers
  • Who was the first famous television and radio evangelist who appeared during the '50s and '60s?
    7·2 answers
  • Describe why the Incan Empire became harder to manage as it grew
    6·1 answer
  • In which of the following situations would the government have been most likely to become involved in union protests?
    10·2 answers
  • What was the importance of the meetings of the Second Continental Congress?
    14·1 answer
  • Because of the labor issues with kids working, Congress passed the
    13·2 answers
  • The Red River Campaign during the
    11·2 answers
  • Evaluate the causes of the growth of slavery in thc Americas between 1521 and 1700
    11·1 answer
  • What were the issues of warden Harding‘s presidency
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!