1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marizza181 [45]
3 years ago
11

neutrality · Sinking of the Lusitania · Woodrow Wilson · Treaty of Versailles All of these terms are associated with what confli

ct? A) World War I B) World War II C) the Korean War D) the Spanish-American War
History
2 answers:
nlexa [21]3 years ago
5 0
Letter A... hope I helped!!!
Bas_tet [7]3 years ago
4 0
The answer if world war 1
You might be interested in
QUICK PLZZ!! 21 POINTS
a_sh-v [17]
1. Vietnam

I’m sorry I did not get the other ones
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
John lewis what did he do that showed guts or courage
Katen [24]

Mr. John Lewis was one of the pioneering leaders of Civil Rights Movement in the 1960, and he kept on battling for individuals' rights since joining Congress in 1987. Lewis was a Freedom Rider, talked at 1963's March on Washington and governs the exhibition that became up popular. He was chosen to Congress in 1986 and got the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2011.


6 0
3 years ago
!!!!!!25 Points AND Brainiest Answer!!!!!!
pashok25 [27]

Answer:

The (1) Trail of Tears was the forced migration of the Cherokees to Indian Territory in Oklahoma. It was a result of the enforcement of the (3) Indian Removal Act, which Andrew Jackson signed into law

4 0
3 years ago
1. How does the author characterize the
nexus9112 [7]

Answer:s the United States enters the 21st century, it stands unchallenged as the world’s economic leader, a remarkable turnaround from the 1980s when many Americans had doubts about U.S. “competitiveness.” Productivity growth—the engine of improvement in average living standards—has rebounded from a 25-year slump of a little more than 1 percent a year to roughly 2.5 percent since 1995, a gain few had predicted.

Economic engagement with the rest of the world has played a key part in the U.S. economic revival. Our relatively open borders, which permit most foreign goods to come in with a zero or low tariff, have helped keep inflation in check, allowing the Federal Reserve to let the good times roll without hiking up interest rates as quickly as it might otherwise have done. Indeed, the influx of funds from abroad during the Asian financial crisis kept interest rates low and thereby encouraged a continued boom in investment and consumption, which more than offset any decline in American exports to Asia. Even so, during the 1990s, exports accounted for almost a quarter of the growth of output (though just 12 percent of U.S. gross domestic product at the end of the decade).

Yet as the new century dawns, America’s increasing economic interdependence with the rest of the world, known loosely as “globalization,” has come under attack. Much of the criticism is aimed at two international institutions that the United States helped create and lead: the International Monetary Fund, launched after World War II to provide emergency loans to countries with temporary balance-of-payments problems, and the World Trade Organization, created in 1995 during the last round of world trade negotiations, primarily to help settle trade disputes among countries.

The attacks on both institutions are varied and often inconsistent. But they clearly have taken their toll. For all practical purposes, the IMF is not likely to have its resources augmented any time soon by Congress (and thus by other national governments). Meanwhile, the failure of the WTO meetings in Seattle last December to produce even a roadmap for future trade negotiations—coupled with the protests that soiled the proceedings—has thrown a wrench into plans to reduce remaining barriers to world trade and investment.

For better or worse, it is now up to the United States, as it has been since World War II, to help shape the future of both organizations and arguably the course of the global economy. A broad consensus appears to exist here and elsewhere that governments should strive to improve the stability of the world economy and to advance living standards. But the consensus breaks down over how to do so. As the United States prepares to pick a new president and a new Congress, citizens and policymakers should be asking how best to promote stability and growth in the years ahead.

Unilateralism

6 0
3 years ago
What was the situation in Germany in the early 1930s that gave Adolf Hitler the opportunity to become the new leader?
Crazy boy [7]

Explanation:

The situation was worse.The whole country had beared a great loss after the war.The people were seeking revenge against the discriminated treaty.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is not an example of raising awareness?
    13·1 answer
  • Who was the democratic senator from Illinois in 1858? who was the republican that ran against him?
    5·1 answer
  • Which practice did Progressives favor?
    7·1 answer
  • whihc ruler of the ottoman empire ruled from 1520 to 1526, revised many law codes and continued the expansion o the ottoman empi
    13·1 answer
  • What occurred after radicals took control of the assembly
    14·1 answer
  • Fog everywhere. Fog up the river... fog down the river, where it rolls defiled among the tiers of shipping, and the waterside po
    15·2 answers
  • Which of these technological developments did not affect the world economies during worl war 1?
    15·1 answer
  • What valuable resource was available in Alaska that was important for business? A. Cattle B. Wood C. Iron D. Oil
    12·2 answers
  • What was the sexual/racial mixing of black and whites called in the slave holding Southern states from the 1820s to the 1850s?
    10·1 answer
  • What arguments does Whattley make in support of the sugar act
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!