Answer:
Winston v. Lee, 470 U.S. 753, 105 S. Ct. 164 (1985)
Explanation:
A man, who was a robbery suspected said to be armed with a gun was shot by a shop owner when he tried to rob his store. The bullet from the gunshots got into the chest of the suspect and there was an attempt by the commonwealth to get a doctor to surgically remove the bullet from the body of the suspect.
The commonwealth could not establish that it would be fitting under the fourth amendment terms to seek crime evidence of this category by simply requesting for surgery.
The court ordered the surgery to be conducted but the results of the x-rays before the scheduled procedure showed that the bullets went much deeper than expected and the risks were higher than anticipated.
Answer:
National Labor Relations Act.
Explanation:
In 1935, the US Congress passed the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) to protect the rights of employees and employers. As the exercise says, this act defines certain conduct of employers and employees as unfair labor practices whilst encouraging collective bargaining.
Answer:
Satisficing
Explanation:
It is a decision making strategy which aimed to purposed a satisfactorily result. Satisficing concentrate on realistic efforts when encountering the task. This strategy aims to focus on the optimal level of solutions. The theory of satisficing was found to be applied in field economics, artificial intelligence, and sociology. Satisficing is a strategy adopted by an organization that seeks to meet the minimal level of expectancies for credits. This contradiction put to maximize the profit by combined attempts that put the organization high demands on the performance crosswise sales, marketing, and other departments.
<span>The act of pickpocketing involves theft from a person. This is different from robbery which involves an act of larceny requiring force or an act that causes the other person to fear for their safety.</span>
Scientists should definitely use evidence - and they collect this evidence though especially designed experiments. Based on their data and assumptions they build models which they then test, but they can base their conclusions based on the models too.
What they should not do is based the conclusions on opinions, because opinions are not imparcial- they can state them as opinions, but not as conclusions.
<span />
