1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marrrta [24]
2 years ago
6

How would the Oklahoma land rush would have been more fair

History
1 answer:
monitta2 years ago
4 0

Answer: It could have been more fair

Explanation:

The government should have made more rules to specify who would get the land and how much they would get instead of having a free for all of people fighting over and being obsessive over land. It could have been more controlled also

You might be interested in
Did the American Revolution fight against an unfair use of power?
qaws [65]
American patriot soldiers were fighting against the stronger British soldiers with a stronger navy, better weapons, and more soldiers to fight. There wasn’t anything unfair, but the British had a leg up in the fight being the top of the top country in warfare.

America winning the war was a big upset for the British as they lost to their own territory.
5 0
3 years ago
Why did the United States invade Afghanistan in 2001? A) To respond to Terrorist attack on U.S territory B) To Protect neighbori
bazaltina [42]
The US innovation of Afghanistan was a response to the 9/11/01 attacks on the US. So A. 
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
can someone give me 6 difference's between the federalist and the Republicans? i need the answer by 11:59 pm!​
Eduardwww [97]

Answer: Hamilton and the Federalists wanted a strong central government, run by well-educated property owners. Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans wanted most power to stay with the states and wanted the farmers and the 'common man' to run the nation.

The Federalists wanted a strong government and strong executive branch, while the anti-Federalists wanted a weaker central government. The Federalists did not want a bill of rights —they thought the new constitution was sufficient. The anti-federalists demanded a bill of rights.

John Adams's presidency was marked by conflicts between the two newly-formed political parties: the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. The conflicts between the two political parties centered on foreign policy and the balance of power between the federal government and the states' governments.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What civil rights issue was the racial and ethnic makeup of juries?
cupoosta [38]
C
answer:yesyesyesyey
5 0
3 years ago
In furman v. georgia, 1972, the court ruled that
Nadya [2.5K]
The answer is A. A helpful website for court case rulings is Oyez.com
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • After world war 2 the United States and Great Britain
    6·1 answer
  • Describe the specific group that would be able to vote for all the rules or laws governing Plymouth
    10·1 answer
  • Which word best describes Hammurabi’s Code?
    7·2 answers
  • What was the lawmaking assembly of Virginia?
    12·2 answers
  • A) In 2-3 sentences evaluate one way in which the religious ideas of the first great awakening impacted colonial society.
    5·1 answer
  • How much money did the french lose from the panama canal
    8·1 answer
  • <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctext%20%7BWhat%20happened%20to%20the%20Mayas%3F%7D" id="TexFormula1" title="\text {What hap
    6·1 answer
  • 9) What is the significance of "Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave." &amp; Uncle Tom's Cabin? FEATUR
    6·1 answer
  • What is the name of the ark angel blowing the horn?
    14·2 answers
  • •2How did voting rights change in the early 1800s?<br> Who<br> did they exclude?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!