Answer: D) CBT cognitive behavioral therapy
Explanation: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a type of psychotherapeutic treatment which is used to treat a wide range of disorders, these disorders includes; addictions, anxiety, phobia as well as depressions.
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is mostly centred around talking i.e the therapist talks to the patients to help them alter the way they sees things (perceptions) which could bring relief to their difficulties.
So Karen might best be helped by a cognitive behavioral therapist to help her overcome her phobia.
I believe the answer is: Examining age at first arrest as a predictor of adult criminal history.
Regardless of their actions, prisoners still had the same right as any legal citizens, which mean they cannot be forced to become a subject of research that might compromise either their psychological or physical well being. Examining age usually can be done simply by reading the prisoners' document.
Answer: The correct answer is B.
saw the price of cotton fall steadily
Explanation: Following the Civil War, white and black farmers in the South saw the price of cotton fall steadily.
Answer:
transmission
Explanation:
In simple words, The transmission communication paradigm defines interaction as a yet another-way, sequential mechanism wherein the source conveys the message and communicates it via a medium to the recipient who computes it.
The propagation of the text is frequently interrupted by ambient and semantic interference. This strategy is generally too simplistic to catch FtF experiences, but may be beneficial for computer-oriented communication.
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
