Answer:
um sure. always here to help
Explanation:
Answer:
his disdain for bureaucracies
Explanation:
"Catch-22" is a novel written by Joseph Heller, an American novelist and playwright. This novel was meant to portray a disdain for bureaucracies, which was very popular in the 1960s. It shows a self-refuting idea about what is considered a common sense or valid in bureaucracy.
As stated in "A Catchy Phrase," "Yossarian" was a bombardier who was afraid to die, however, he has to follow the military regulation that they should not avoid combat missions. So, this highlights the standard operating procedures that bombardiers have to follow. It shows a <u>self-defeating idea</u>, since both ideas do not coincide with each other. He can just say "no" if he didn't want to and that would consider him as sane. Nevertheless, he needed to do his job because he was working as a bombardier, so this makes him crazy.
Because if they did then they might be found where they were hiding
Answer: Anger is an ineffective way for people get their points across. The following reasons are why. In the protests that have been going on many people have been showing their anger by robbing and vandalizing businesses by doing this they not only are ruining the city but also getting themselves in trouble by getting arrested. Martin Luther King Jr not once used violence to get his point across but he instead protested peacefully and with peace and he inspired people to follow him and they did at the end he changed many people's minds and got his point across. This shows that people don't need violence or anger to get there point through because there have been true examples showing us that you could still get what you want without getting angry. The last reason why I think that anger is ineffective is the following. Let me give this example, if you were to see a person who would yell, always be angry and want to start a fight with someone and they told you that there way of doing things was right would you listen to them? On the other hand if you were to see a person who talked calm tried to listen to others and gave good reason of their decision would you listen to them? It's exactly what going on if people protest with anger and violence they would not listen to them or not have much attention to them but if we act with calmness and patience they will acknowledge us and try to get to know our beliefs and thoughts.
Explanation: My 3 reasons simplified are if you use anger you will receive anger back, there have been real examples that actually work and changed people in where they did not use anger and it still worked basically it's been proved that even though you do not use anger it still works.My last reason is that you have to think about it, would you listen to people who use anger and violence or would you listen to people who are calm and patient and inspire other people with truth and kindness.
