1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Soloha48 [4]
2 years ago
9

Why is it important that colonial people gain their independence? NO LINKS PLZ

History
2 answers:
liq [111]2 years ago
7 0

Colonial nations are not mere offshoots of the European nations that gave birth to them. The geography, ecology, history of the continent forged them as original identities, like it did for the indigenous when they came millenia ago. To remove them from this context is to remove them from what made their identities in the first place. It’s to such a point you can see very similar behaviours and interests in some circumstances. For example, both indigenous and allogenous populations try to lobby to keep seal-hunting going, because it’s their way of life since centuries and a major source of revenues they depend on.

For example, the Afrikaner people of South Africa, who were originally Dutch, were acknowledged as a new African nation by other indigenous African peoples like the Xhoza and Zulu, and it’s not shallow words. For centuries, many generations made their life in Africa, without ever thinking of going back to Europe. They are not Europeans anymore now. The great events that made their identity, like the Great Trek, the war against the Zulu, the wars against the British are all tied to the African continent.

Besides, it’s dangerous to put conditions on the principle of autodetermination, because when you start doing that, you open the door for every imperialism and colonialism of the world.

What matters is to make things in a way that would not dispossess further the indigenous nations that managed to survive. The great challenge of our time is to think hard about how that can be done.

Another aspect of the issue is when you start considering the actual logistics of deporting close to one billion allogenous peoples. Where would you put them ? In the overcrowded Europe ? You saw how they panicked when they were asked to welcome just a few refugees from Syria, imagined they got “Second Amendment Americans” ? Would you put them in Antarctica ? The Protocol of Madrid forbids the colonization of Antarctica. 500 years of history cannot be undone just like that. So it’s quite, quite not so simple. We are cursed to coexist now. It cannot be simple anymore.

<em>-</em><em> </em><em>BRAINLIEST</em><em> answerer</em>

abruzzese [7]2 years ago
3 0

Answer: because the king created unreasonable taxes and those taxes were created because Britain just fought the French and Indians

You might be interested in
Both Americans and Soviet citizens listened to President Reagan's Address at Moscow State University. Which best describes the d
Nookie1986 [14]

Answer:

Option B- Reagan’s purpose was to remind Americans of their freedoms and to encourage Soviets to allow more individual freedom.

Explanation:

Just took the test on edge2020

4 0
3 years ago
Explain the historical circumstances that lead to Mao Zedongs delivery of the speech proclamation of the central people’s govern
maxonik [38]

Answer:

I learned about this last unit and if I have it correct, Mao wanted to get the peasants to side with him to defeat the Japanese invaders, so the communists gave benefits to the peasants

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
How much were African-American soldiers paid compared to white soldiers?
irina1246 [14]

Answer:

Seven Dollars per month is what the African Americans were getting paid compared to white people.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
What element do Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur share?
Anton [14]
The element that Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur share is : They both are considered high holy days
Rosh Hashanah is the  Jewish new year , while the Yom Kippur is known as the Day of the atonement for the Jewish

hope this helps
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. Discuss the Supreme Court’s decisions in Webster v. Reproductive Services (1989) and Casey v. Planned Parenthood (1992). A. H
kati45 [8]

<em>Webster v. Reproductive Services</em> was a Supreme Court case that upheld a Missouri law which placed restrictions of how state funds could be utilized for abortions. This case originated in Missouri. This case upheld restrictions that were viewed as unlikely in <em>Roe v. Wade</em>. In <em>Casey v. Planned Parenthood</em> is was ruled that the state can regulate abortions up to the point of fetal viability (the moment when a fetus could live outside of the womb). In <em>Roe, </em>the state could not regulate any aspect of the abortion process. While <em>Roe v. Wade</em> remains in force, these cases provide specific guidance as it relates to the role of the state in this process.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Someone pls help me! Why did the Federalists believe a strong national government ran by the elite was the best for the American
    6·1 answer
  • Alexander Hamilton was among the most important of the Founding Fathers. Which of the following is he responsible for? Select al
    8·1 answer
  • What do I do?
    14·2 answers
  • BRAINLIST
    6·1 answer
  • What does Arnold say about goal setting and<br> motivation?
    10·1 answer
  • 2 Writing an acceptable thesis
    12·2 answers
  • Think about the text The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare to answer question 7, Drag to arrange each incident
    12·1 answer
  • The introduction of materials into the atmosphere which produces adverse effects especially to human and their daily activities
    10·1 answer
  • What social injustice happened to George Washington Carver when he was 6 years old?
    8·1 answer
  • What does Militia mean
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!