Explanation:
The caning of Charles Sumner detailed Senator Charles Sumner of Massachusetts arguing that what was done to Kansas (pro-slavery people illegally swept the polls and vowed to kill all abolitionists, followed by over 200 people killed in the violence that followed) was very bad as well as slavery. He singled out Andrew Pickens Butler of South Carolina, and his cousin, Preston S Brooks, beat Sumner with a cane until it broke on May 22, 1856. This showed how fiery and aggressive the North and South were to each other in the events leading to the Civil War, as they were literally willing to kill other members of Congress to get their points across. It is important to note that in most legislative sessions both before and after the event, violence was rare if there at all
They were trying to achieve self-determination
I would say that such an international team would rely on its diversity to give it an advantage of a team only from one nation as say in a geological international team that had members from countries with different geological environments ie say one that had major volcanoes like Ecuador or Guatemala compared to one that had major Precambrian Shields like say Brazil or Canada would have an overall much more rounded understanding of the composition of the earth not restricted to a small part of it.,,
I believe c.tariffs enabled the north's manufacturers to compete with foreign manufactured goods
The lynching of sheriff Henry Plummer poses one of the most haunting mysteries of the Old West. The story is well-known: in 1863, miners at the booming gold camp of Bannack (then in Idaho Territory, now in Montana) elected a sheriff. The soft-spoken young Easterner proved to be an efficient lawman, yet in 1864 he was lynched by vigilantes. Their apologist Thomas Dimsdale explained to the populace that the sheriff had been a ‘very demon’ who directed a band guilty of murdering more than 100 citizens.
