I think the correct answer would be the third option. Using an implied main idea would not be a good strategy for writing a supporting sentence. These sentences should contain substance or evidences that would support the main idea of what you are writing. Using implied ideas would be very vague for the readers making the readers doubt on what message you are conveying. Supporting sentences should be straight to the point and be very specific and should provide a good foundation for the main idea. Using facts, examples and statistics that are verified by reliable people are very good strategies in writing supporting sentences.
Answer:
False
Explanation: A faction is a smaller group inside a larger one.
Answer:
She brought the hurricane victims so the listeners would hear their stories from their perspective.
Explanation:
Cheryl Corley was aware that describing the experiences the victims of the hurricane had from a third person perspective would not accurately convey the horrors the victims experienced so she had to include the interviews of the victims themselves so listeners would better the experience from the first person perspective.
When a story is being narrated in the third person narrative, that is another person describing events from a detached view the emotions are not properly captured and the 0erson simply describes it the way he sees it or thinks it happened. It is not an accurate way of describing events.
When narrating an experience in the first person, the person describes it exactly how it happened to them and how they felt when it was happening and how they felt after the event. It is a description based on the descriptor's experience.
The one that is a simple subject from the sentence above is : D. Genes
Simple subject is the main word in a group of words that basically tell what the sentence is all about. We can all agree that that sentence is talking about genes
hope this helps
Good afternoon!
Answer-
Booth storys feel for the elephants they kill in the story, which makes the two storys simmalar. This is one reson how this act reflects George Orvell's attitude toward British Imperialisım. In the end, they both relize how wrong it was to do what there doing. That is how it reflects George Orvell's attitude toward British Imperialisım.
Have a nice day!
-Sky
(I would really love brainlest if posible ;)
