Answer:
This statement is CORRECT: <u>One can keep adding premises to inductive arguments to make them go from strong to weak, then back to strong again, etc.</u>
Explanation:
The inductive reasoning is based on how the the premises are built, in order for them to lead us to a conclusion. This is why building the right premises can lead to a week or strong argument.
The process of builing a inductive argument is based on specific observations or statements into more general aspects. Although strong premises can lead to strong arguments, they do not garantee the conclusion would be true.
In logic, inductive argument it is not classify as valid or invalid, it is strong or weak according to the premises. The premises can be testable for instance, or they can come from observation.
You find it in Australia, usually in the southeast area.
Japan was never colonised by Europeans
I think you've missed a word; do you mean: explain why do presidents think that military is important.
Military is important for security, and without the military a country can't defend itself: see the attack on Pearl Harbor.
With a strong army the president has more power and cannot be threatened by other countries.
The operant conditioning concept of positive reinforcement is illustrated when the next day, her boss gave her a gift certificate to a local coffee shop. As a result, Janice now regularly cleans out the office refrigerator.
Positive reinforcement simply means the process of establishing a pattern of behavior by giving a reward when such behavior is exhibited.
In this case, since Janice cleaned out the office refrigerator without being asked and her boss gave her a gift certificate to a local coffee shop, she'll continually clean it.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/25493656
