In "AND YET THE BOOKS" does it address the terms in which the times he lived in, or in more of a personal way?

English

2 answers:

Savatey [412]2 years ago

3 0

can you please explain your question a little more into detail

Ksivusya [100]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

This poem illustrates the immortal quality of books. Even though humans perish, the books they write never truly do as they have the strength of a story to survive and thrive on. The title itself portrays the continuity of literature, saying that despite all, the books will still be there.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Imagery in literature means ?

Elanso [62]

When a writer attempts to describe something so that it appeals to our sense of smell, sight, taste, touch, or hearing

3 0

2 years ago

based on the events in barrio boy what is the best inference about ernosto's mother A she mostly lives in the united B she is in

yan [13]

Answer:

Poor and health

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of these is NOT a meaning of the root super or sur?

Fantom [35]

Answer:

the last choice, only/alone

Explanation:

all the other choices make sense as the root word sur means, "over," "above," and "in addition to." and the choices "greater than," and "beyond" make sense as well because the root word super means those two things as well as a few of the words that have to do with the root word sur. the only choice that doesn't fit in is the last one.

8 0

2 years ago

Read the excerpt below and answer the question. “Well,” he says, “there’s excuse for picks and letting-on, in a case like this;

Naily [24]

the answer could be explicit but i could be wrong.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Describe, in your own words, Sartre’s idea of the importance of reality and how that concept informs his view of cowardice. Your

bixtya [17]

Describe, in your own words, Sartre’s idea of the importance of reality and how that concept informs his view of cowardice.

In his 1946 work "Existentialism is Humanism", Sartre explores existentialism and its effect on humanity. He states that a coward is: "defined by the deed that he has done. What people feel obscurely, and with horror, is that the coward as we present him is guilty of being a coward." The action of the coward defines him, an aspect that can be changed only by him. If he is committed to change what defines him, he can erase the notion of being a coward.

Nevertheless, Sartre mentions that “There is no reality except in action”, and this reveals the importance of reality. Humans, regardless of the outcome of an unattainable future, are still in control of some aspects of their reality through their actions; thus, they can shape their individual futures in a way.

This is "total freedom" defined solely by the individual, as Sartre says: "Those who hide from this total freedom, in a guise of solemnity or with deterministic excuses, I shall call cowards." What matters in someone's existence is what is decided. A decision is going to shape someone's reality and will define whether the person is a hero or a coward.

7 0

3 years ago