The concept of using dynamic markings (which indicate the relative loudness of different sections in the music) in sheet music came about around the same time as the piano — for good reason. Before the invention of the piano by Bartolomeo Cristofori in 1709, most composers were confined to writing most of their pieces for either the harpsichord or the clavichord; neither instrument had the capability to play both soft and loud sounds easily.
The reason for this is that the basic internal design of both the harpsichord and the clavichord follows the design of a stringed instrument. However, instead of having one’s fingers in direct contact with the string, as with a guitar or a fiddle, harpsichords and clavichords are fitted with a plucking mechanism inside the instrument itself. When a certain key is pressed, the corresponding internal string is plucked by the mechanism. No matter how hard or soft you press the keys of either instrument, the resulting volume is pretty much the same. Therefore, clavichords were used for quiet pieces of music that required lots of vibrato (quavering quality to notes that usually comes from a stringed instrument), whereas harpsichords were used for louder, brighter-sounding pieces.
Although the piano looks a lot like these two other instruments, it’s really very different. The piano incorporates a hammer-and-lever mechanism that strikes each string with the same force as the human finger on the piano key did; this is why the piano is considered a percussive instrument. The piano made both quiet and loud sounds possible on the same instrument, and, therefore, in the same musical piece. This is why the piano was originally named the gravicèmbalo col pian e forte, or “harpsichord with soft and loud.” The name was later shortened to pianoforte and, finally, to piano.
Since its inception, the piano has been the universal tool of choice for composing music, because almost every note you would ever want to work with is present on the keyboard, right there in front of you. Most pianos have at least 7 octaves to work with, and concert pianos can have more than 12 octaves.
Go on a bike ride or take your dog for a walk.
Answer: to be honest, a movie called Padmaavat
Explanation: Although most Bhansali movies are aesthetically pleasing, especially Padmaavat, the way that he writes his characters in this movie are a bit off. Especially in the movie Padmaavat, he writes the character Alauddin Khilji in a more barbaric way, although in real life he was a mild mannered person, and the character Ratan Singh as a calm and collected man. So it seems like as if Bhansali is making Alauddin to be a rogue and barbaric Muslim king and Ratan the righteous and heroic Hindu king. Bhansali also shuts out the fact that Alauddin may have been in a relationship with his slave general Malik Kaufur, and that Alauddin might have even been bi or gay, but in the movie, you see no example of them even being close in a romantic way. So, what I would change is Alauddin’s character, and make him a more proper and calm character and reprsent Alauddin and Malik’s relationship. With the character Padmavati, I feel like that they represented her in a different light. I feel that they didn’t really represent her Sinhalese heritage. Also in the Ghoomar scene, a Rajput queen would probably never dance in front of anyone, they would be watching other dancers. Also the top Deepika wore showed her bosom, which Rajput queens would never show. So, I would try to positively change all the factors I just stated in this paragraph and hope that Sanjay Leela Bhansali will continue to create more beautiful movies.
Answer:
D. Jenna was enjoying the quiet and her new book until she heard a loud crash coming from the kitchen.
If by properties, you mean what wool is composed of, it would be carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen.
I hope this helps!!
