All of these are defensible. Of course debt rises in war, and decreasing taxes will benefit an economy where taxes are no longer needed (post-scarcity.) Political and geographical boundaries are outmoded and a world without them is not only possible but existed for much of early human civilization. As for the government, a government would run more efficiently when everyone is in basic agreement with what to do and how.
I would question your teacher on this. Anyone can defend these perspectives...
It increased the demand for coal and iron. we need the iron to build things and the coal to power things. Remember coal is what powered the steam engine.
The two developments that led to a state of emergency being formally declared in 1965 by the governor of Kenya were:
- Mau Mau attacks on individuals and settlements loyal to Britain.
- failure of a 1950 ban to stop the growth of the Mau Mau Rebellion.
<h3>Why did Kenya see a state of emergency in 1952?</h3>
As anti-colonial sentiment spread across Africa after World War II, Kenya was no different and the Mau Mau organization was one of those that pushed for independence in Kenya.
They went about it violently however by attacking individuals and settlements that were seen as pro-British and therefore had government protection.
This led to a ban in 1950 to stop the growth of the Mau Mau organization. This ban failed however, as the Mau Mau only grew in numbers and popularity.
In the end, the governor had to declare a state of emergency to deal with the Mau Mau Uprising.
Find out more on the Mau Mau rebellion at brainly.com/question/26522309
#SPJ1
