Answer:
<h2>direct democracy</h2><h2>Issues and controversies</h2><h2>Discussions on direct-democratic institutions deal with several issues. The strongest normative grounds for direct democracy are the democratic principles of popular sovereignty, political equality, and all the arguments for participative democracy that support the idea that all citizens should have the right not only to elect representatives but also to vote on policy issues in referenda. Since assembly democracy cannot be an option in modern societies (outside Switzerland), direct-democratic institutions are regarded not as a full-scale alternative to representative democracy but as a supplement to or counterweight within democratic systems with major representative features. Nevertheless, the institutional difference and competition between representative and direct-democratic processes lie at the core of the controversy whether direct democracy contributes to undermining representative democracy or can offer enrichments of democracy.</h2>
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
<h3>correct me if I'm wrong</h3><h3>please brainless my answer</h3>
Answer:
the use of British bases in the Atlantic
Explanation:
<span>It saw a return with televangelism. :)</span>
Answer:
B
Explanation:
because Monroe Doctrine was a treaty that agreed that States that the U.S. could use military force to get rid of European powers that entered and tried to conquer lands in the western hemisphere.
The French reacted to Jay's treaty with England by beginning to capture American ships. Not only they captured ships, they also withheld war supplies to America.
This was a treaty between the United States and Great Britain that averted war and resolved issues. It marked the first use of negotiation as a means of settling an international dispute. It also prepared a way for settlement of the long dispute with Spain.
