After ratification of the fifteenth amendment, how many African Americans served in congress in the late 1800s?

History

2 answers:

vovikov84 [41]2 years ago

8 0

The correct answer is about twenty. i took the test.

Naily [24]2 years ago

3 0

The answer is >>>>>>>{ Above 20 }

You might be interested in

pls help me it is due today, there are two right anwsers and pls no links. Thank You so much to can help.

mamaluj [8]

Answer: a time period where the north and south would need to rebuild

Explanation: most stuff was destroyed from the war meaning they needed to rebuild

3 0

1 year ago

Based on the map, which of the following choices is the most likely reason for the loss of the wetlands as the United States gre

spin [16.1K]

Answer:people replaced wetlands with crop land

Explanation:trust

4 0

3 years ago

What civil rights issue was the racial and ethnic makeup of juries?

cupoosta [38]

C
answer:yesyesyesyey

5 0

3 years ago

What speech is prote hat speech is protected by the First Amendment?

Oksana_A [137]

Answer:

Stroke speech, apparently

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

What could be a result of a government not adhering to the rule of law? (Select all that apply.)

soldi70 [24.7K]

The correct answers are A) Laws change often and there is no standard process for deciding what will become law, C) Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, and E) Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens.

The results of a government NOT ADHERING to the rule of law could be the following: Laws change often and there is no standard process for deciding what will become law, Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, and Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens.

The rule of law means that nobody, including the government, is above the law. The rule of law is doing this right by every single member in a society. No exceptions.

So The results of a government NOT ADHERING to the rule of law could be disastrous for the civic life in a society and the security of its citizens. Laws could change and for any reason, to the convenience of the officials. There would be a tendency for corruptive practices. Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, it could become the "law of the jungle," or the survivor of the fittest. And finally, Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens. This means that the powerful men in power can do whatever the like, and impose their will on people.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers