They went to the market twice a week. The cat drank milk. She works at the supermarket.T he river flows into the sea. Mahesh read books in the library. I ate breakfast at seven o'clock. We swim in the pool on Sundays. the plants grow in good soil. The cat slept by the fireplace.
have a great day! brainliest?<3
D. All of the answers are correct.
Answer: According to Beatty, society got so overpopulated, so sensitive to insult, and so concerned with pleasure, that things which created divisions became so unwelcome as to be dangerous to social order itself. The startling point of Beatty's explanation is that censorship started with the people, not the government (although the government stepped in later in accordance with the people's wishes). Most people stopped reading books long before they were ever burned. In Fahrenheit 451, society evolved into Bradbury's dystopia after the population dramatically increased and technology improved. ... Eventually, the population stopped reading and preferred to consume mindless entertainment. The government capitalized on the population's ignorance by censoring literature altogether. He's the head honcho fireman, but he knows more about books than anyone else. He burns these texts with a fiery vengeance (wink wink), but he spends half his time quoting from them. ... He used to be curious about books, just like Montag is. He used to question the system, just like Montag.
Explanation: I put info about diff things. Hopfuly this was helpful.
Answer:
The important factors for a "good" school are: great leadership, high expectations of everyone involved, security and organization of the students, and of course, diversity. One school is noticeable "better" than the other when it shows great management and distribution of knowledgeable and useful materials to the students. Diversity is important because it helps people to be more open-minded and accepting of all individuals regardless of religion, sexual orientation, and skin color. School with diverse population is way better than school who only one or two ethics group, because this results on a narrow perspective of the world and other knowledge that is not found in school textbooks, but to the environment as well.
For example, privilege schools with a huge population of white students who have little to none exposure to POC can result in closemindedness or ignorance of POC's struggles because they are "not used to it" since they only hang-out with people the same as them.
Explanation:
This paragraph is an example of a Toulmin argument.
The Toulmin method has six elements: claim, grounds, warrant, backing, qualifier, and rebuttal. The elements are used in this paragraph are;
<u>Claim</u>: a statement that the author wants the audience to accept as true.
<em>"I believe the cost of drilling is too high."</em>
<u>Grounds</u>: information that the claim is based off of.
<em>"I agree with environmentalists who fear that drilling will disturb the migration of more than 130,000 caribou."</em>
<u>Backing</u>: additional support for the claim by addressing different points related to your claim.
"In addition, experts say that the oil in the area adds up to less than a six-month supply."
<u>Rebuttal</u>: addresses the opposing view to reinforce the original argument.
<em>"Is such a small amount of oil worth the risk drilling poses to the animals?"</em>