Answer:
Child development
Explanation:
This theory focused on child development and interaction with the context. The theory indicates the entangled layers of the environment which affect the growth of child development. The name of this theory becomes renowned as a B<u>io-ecological Theory </u>which suggests that child biology is the primary factor that sustaining his development. The main factors which contribute to the maturing of children are his biology, family environment and social interaction. If some changing occurs in one layer get impact on other layers.
Bronfenbrenner's gives five layers of the system areas:
- Microsystem
- Mesosystem
- Exosystem
- Macrosystem
- Chronosystem
There isn't much of a difference but they do differ in that forensics have to do with more "scientific" related things and criminalistics primarily deal with crime scene evidence collection.<span>
</span>
Answer:
The Preamble.
Explanation:
Although the preamble of Constitution has only 52 words it serves as a great introduction because among the other things it tells us who is actually adopting the Constitution <em>"We the People of the United States."</em>
Although short, this document is very important and has its own value.
Steve is guilty, if he's reciting word for word what he told for the detectives it's most likely scripted. Accusing, and avoiding is also commonly found in guilty people.
A speech community is a group of people who share a set of linguistic norms and expectations regarding the use of language.[1]
Exactly how to define speech community is debated in the literature. Definitions of speech community tend to involve varying degrees of emphasis on the following:
Shared community membershipShared linguistic communication
Early definitions have tended to see speech communities as bounded and localized groups of people who live together and come to share the same linguistic norms because they belong to the same local community. It has also been assumed that within a community a homogeneous set of normsshould exist. These assumptions have been challenged by later scholarship that has demonstrated that individuals generally participate in various speech communities simultaneously and at different times in their lives. Each speech community has different norms that they tend to share only partially. Communities may be de-localized and unbounded rather than local, and they often comprise different sub-communities with differing speech norms. With the recognition of the fact that speakers actively use language to construct and manipulate social identities by signalling membership in particular speech communities, the idea of the bounded speech community with homogeneous speech norms has become largely abandoned for a model based on the speech community as a fluid community of practice.
A speech community comes to share a specific set of norms for language use through living and interacting together, and speech communities may therefore emerge among all groups that interact frequently and share certain norms and ideologies. Such groups can be villages, countries, political or professional communities, communities with shared interests, hobbies, or lifestyles, or even just groups of friends. Speech communities may share both particular sets of vocabulary and grammatical conventions, as well as speech styles and genres, and also norms for how and when to speak in particular ways.
