1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Yanka [14]
3 years ago
13

Why was the Reapportionment Act of 1929 passed? The number of senators per state was changing as the country expanded. Congressi

onal districts were redrawn to establish safe seats for the political parties. Membership in the House needed to be capped to prevent an excessive number of members. The House was limited to two representatives per state.
History
2 answers:
OleMash [197]3 years ago
7 0

The Reapportionment Act of 1929 was a joined statement and distribution bill enacted by the Congress in the United States on June 18, 1929, that authenticated a continual process for allocating a permanent 435 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives for each census.

Further Explanation:

Notwithstanding, in relation to the other Apportionment Acts, the 1929 Act did not revoke nor reinstalled the requirements of the preceding apportionment acts that congress does not border the areas which are compressed, and consistently have the population explosion. It was not apparent whether these situations were still in force till1932 as the Supreme Court did not give the decision on the fundamentals of each division act hit only the population due to the reason they have registered.

Thus, last declared in the Apportionment Act of 1911 to the range and population specifications, dismissed with the impersonation Act of the 1929. The 1929 Act conferred restricted management concerning congressional re-districting. It hardly authorized a method in which seats of the house would be reallocated to republics which have supplanted in community. The lack of preparations regarding districts had copious significant impacts. The Reapportionment Act of 1929 authorized states to form areas of different size and pattern.

Learn More:

1. What was the charge of the 1807 indictment by the man who was chosen as vice president on February 17, 1801, by the House of Representatives after thirty-six ballots? brainly.com/question/8775340

2. A losing party in a federal trial court can? brainly.com/question/3507920

Answer Details:

Grade: High school

Subject: History

Topic: Reappointment Act 1929

Keywords:

Reappointment, act, population, relocation, substitution, pattern, size, supreme court, districts, congress, border, methods, community.

kow [346]3 years ago
6 0

The reapportionment Act of 1929 was passed because membership in the house needed to be capped to prevent an excessive number of members.

On June 11, 1929, the House of Representatives passed the apportionment ACT which adjusted the number of representative as 435. The constitution of the United States called for at least one representative per state and that no more than one representatives for 30,000 persons. The size of state house delegation of a state will consequently relied on its population.

However, the founders were confused as to how large future congress should be after each federal census. The founders were also confused as to the method to be used to reapportion the house.

This uncertainty disturbed the congress as the United States territories widened and its population increased.

Normally, the House of Representatives reapportion itself in a way that didn’t affect the representation of most states. However, the method of calculating apportionment really affected the rural states by losing their representation to larger urbanized states.

Following 1920 census, the house was not able to apportion itself because of a battle that broke out among the rural and urban factions. On June 18, 1929, the house passed the permanent apportionment, which capped house membership after 1910 census. The act created a procedure whereby house seat were automatically apportioned after every decennial census.

LEARN MORE:

  • Why was the Reapportionment Act of 1929 passed brainly.com/question/9949954

KEYWORDS:

  • apportionment
  • reapportionment act
  • 1910 census
  • house membership
You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP :)<br> List 4 causes for the downfall of the Western half of the Roman Empire.
antoniya [11.8K]

Answer:

Height of power, systematic weaknesses.

Climatic worsening and plague.

Crisis of the Third Century.

Reunification and political division.

Growing social divisions.

Explanation:

thats all

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2. Identify Supporting Details What human rights issues did Reagan
Tanzania [10]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

What human rights issues did Reagan encounter during his battle against communism in the 1980s?

At the very beginning of his administration, United States President Ronald Reagan clearly showed he was not in favor of the human rights approach instilled and inherited by his predecessor Jimmy Carter.

With the support of its ally, the United Kingdom, Reagan decided to take a series of actions to stop Communism, as was the case of the Iran-Contra Affair, the bombing of Beirut, and the bombing of Lybia, The international community questioned these Reagan's Doctrine actions, and one of the observations was his careless approach to human rights.

But the Reagan's most questionable issue on human rights was the controversial acts of the School of the Americas training program overseen by the CIA and teh Pentagon in Central America. It is said that the agency trained Central American armies in torture to fight populists and communist governments. The US government was accused to commit human rights violations to the degree that teh Pentagon had to publicly publish its training manuals.

4 0
3 years ago
What were some examples of racial injustice within the military?
kobusy [5.1K]

There are none, everybody is treated equally racial wise.

3 0
3 years ago
What percentage of Oklahomans continued trying to farm through the dust storms?
Sphinxa [80]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
The archaeologists’ term “correlated age” means the calendar age of an artifact. the actual age of an artifact. the age of an ar
Andrei [34K]

Answer:

I think it's the age of an artifact in relation to other objects because the word "correlated" has a similar meaning.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Geographer james vance recognized the importance of the __________ in the evolution of the spatial form of the american city.
    14·1 answer
  • The Chavin civilization was located in which modern-day country? (1 point)
    5·1 answer
  • which of the following might have been the two main reasons European nations 'scrambled' for territory in Africa in the 19th cen
    11·1 answer
  • An effect of the Dawes Act was that American Indians:
    11·2 answers
  • Who was considered a pioneer in the field of textile technology?
    9·1 answer
  • According to john Locke, If the government fails to to protect natural rights, what could the citizens do?
    12·1 answer
  • How did the federal government resond to the decline of american cities
    12·2 answers
  • Can you please help me with this? please...
    12·1 answer
  • What generalization could you make from this chart about murder and Prohibition in America?
    5·1 answer
  • Give two reasons why archaeology is important today
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!