1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mariarad [96]
3 years ago
13

How to write a formal letter to a Minster of health ​

English
1 answer:
matrenka [14]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Dear Honourable Leona Aglukkaq,

Belated congratulations on your appointment. We are heartened by the appointment of someone with your experience as a health minister in Nunavut. By now, you will have settled in, been brought up to speed by ministry officials and learned how Cabinet sets priorities and policies.

We were disappointed that the recent budget did not stress health as a major concern. Our greatest fear is that hard economic times will lead to another round of cuts to the transfer payments from the federal government to the provincial governments for health care. We hope that the health of Canadians remains a priority for the federal government.

After more than a decade, the health system has not fully recovered from the last round of federal cuts in the mid-1990s. The large reduction of about 10% in federal funding for health forced provincial governments to axe many health care programs, close some hospitals and reduce the number of beds in the remaining institutions, as well as slash training positions for physicians and other health care providers.

Another unintended secondary effect was that the federal influence on health decreased as federal funding decreased. Provincial governments have become much more autonomous and, in many instances, unwilling to adopt new programs and standards in the interest of all Canadians. The ongoing jurisdictional battle between federal and provincial governments, whether over First Nations health, public health, access to care and expensive medications or the setting of national standards, suggests that the federal government has little influence on Canada’s health systems. The ability of the provinces to offer private services1 and mount administrative barriers to portability of services without consequences is a constant reminder of this weakened federal authority.

Canada’s health care systems seem to be moving further and further away from fulfilling the promise of the Canada Health Act. Twenty-four years after it was passed, we are left with 14 fragmented health systems with major differences in health outcomes and significant disparities in health services. Quebec alone provides a program for drug coverage, but it has too few long-term care beds and many tertiary care hospitals housed in dilapidated buildings. In Ontario, hospitals are better funded, but there is limited home care and no universal drug coverage. And, as you are well aware, Canada’s federally funded Aboriginal health system is plagued with major access issues,2 and Nunavut’s only hospital has failed to meet minimum accreditation standards.

There have been glimmers of hope. In 2000, in response to public pressure, the First Ministers put forth a vision for health care, which was augmented through health accords in 2003 and 2004.3,4 Systemic changes were urged, including re-forming primary care and providing greater access to primary care practitioners, increasing the number of health practitioners, decreasing wait times, developing home care services, implementing a program to provide universal access to medications modelled on Quebec’s program or our national medicare system and improving the reporting of health outcomes. Subsequently, health care cash transfers to the provinces increased from $16.5 billion in 2006 to $24 billion by 2009/10 (plus substantial tax point transfers).

Five years later, the federal government has written cheques to the provinces, but the gains are at best modest. Wait times for many procedures have not decreased substantially in many jurisdictions. There are major shortages of health professionals. And we are still waiting for a nationwide drug benefit and national indicators to ensure accountability. Canadians need reform that will improve primary care access and health outcomes.

The reason for limited progress is an erosion of national leadership in health. Successive federal governments have either decreased investments or, through inaction, allowed health to be a purely provincial matter. Despite the importance of health in the minds of the voting public, we remain very concerned that health has slipped entirely off the federal agenda.

While we trust that your government will continue to act in the public interest, paying some of the bills is not good enough. We urge you and your government to provide real leadership by enforcing the Canada Health Act and acting on decisions emanating from the health accords. Further delays will only mean that more Canadians will suffer. Our nation’s health depends on you.

Explanation:

here is your answer Hope you will enjoy and mark me as brainlist

thank you

You might be interested in
Which word or words should be capitalized in this sentence?
barxatty [35]
A. mission bay aquatic center

6 0
3 years ago
Which pronoun correctly completes the sentence?
nadezda [96]
Whoever is the answer . i just took this assessment and go it right:)
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the first verse, why is 2Pac saying in the first three lines about his race in relation to society?
Licemer1 [7]

Answer: he is saying how everyone is feeling during his time when African American and how there is no changes how other people act towards them, he is poor and people steal and hurt him too so he wants to die also cuz hes gets problems for being African American

5 0
4 years ago
In 200 words, explain how the incident with the rabid dog in chapter 10 and the death of Mrs. Dubose in chapter 11 relates to th
zmey [24]
If you’re talking about To Kill a Mockingbird:
The rabied dog was killed by Atticus when the sheriff asked him to take the shot. Atticus was against guns and taught his children that guns were not needed. The children however, found out that Atticus was a very good shot in his childhood, this is the reason why he was asked to take the shot. When he shot the dog, he overcame his problem with guns, and showed courage to even shoot the gun. When mrs Dubous died, the courage was shown through both of the children, especially Scout since she did not need to go to the house with her brother every day. After her death, the children learned that Atticus only made them go to her house after school everyday because he knew she was going to die and she deserved to have someone by her side when it happened. So even though the children were scared of her, they faced their fears to help her enjoy her last few days on earth.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The misuse of public property and some ways of curbing it​
Ghella [55]

Answer:

this is the land of the owner lands

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How science helps people's lives is really neat!
    13·2 answers
  • Is the following an example of a simile, metaphor, paradox, or personification? The rumbling storm sounded like a freight train
    5·2 answers
  • Of the two central characters, the adjutant and Timothy Lean, which man appears to be more "calm and collected?" Defend your ans
    15·1 answer
  • In this sonnet, the speaker describes a powerful love for someone with no personal merits. Which lines describe this puzzling ab
    9·1 answer
  • Why are many hoaxes released over the Internet? (Apex)
    6·2 answers
  • What is Credit Explain in your own word?
    9·1 answer
  • Read the following sentence from the passage.
    5·1 answer
  • Read the paragraph from Emma’s essay.
    15·1 answer
  • Who loves cats !? (≧▽≦)(◠‿◕)​
    8·2 answers
  • I want to learn about the history of Siege of the International Legations
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!