1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mariarad [96]
3 years ago
13

How to write a formal letter to a Minster of health ​

English
1 answer:
matrenka [14]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Dear Honourable Leona Aglukkaq,

Belated congratulations on your appointment. We are heartened by the appointment of someone with your experience as a health minister in Nunavut. By now, you will have settled in, been brought up to speed by ministry officials and learned how Cabinet sets priorities and policies.

We were disappointed that the recent budget did not stress health as a major concern. Our greatest fear is that hard economic times will lead to another round of cuts to the transfer payments from the federal government to the provincial governments for health care. We hope that the health of Canadians remains a priority for the federal government.

After more than a decade, the health system has not fully recovered from the last round of federal cuts in the mid-1990s. The large reduction of about 10% in federal funding for health forced provincial governments to axe many health care programs, close some hospitals and reduce the number of beds in the remaining institutions, as well as slash training positions for physicians and other health care providers.

Another unintended secondary effect was that the federal influence on health decreased as federal funding decreased. Provincial governments have become much more autonomous and, in many instances, unwilling to adopt new programs and standards in the interest of all Canadians. The ongoing jurisdictional battle between federal and provincial governments, whether over First Nations health, public health, access to care and expensive medications or the setting of national standards, suggests that the federal government has little influence on Canada’s health systems. The ability of the provinces to offer private services1 and mount administrative barriers to portability of services without consequences is a constant reminder of this weakened federal authority.

Canada’s health care systems seem to be moving further and further away from fulfilling the promise of the Canada Health Act. Twenty-four years after it was passed, we are left with 14 fragmented health systems with major differences in health outcomes and significant disparities in health services. Quebec alone provides a program for drug coverage, but it has too few long-term care beds and many tertiary care hospitals housed in dilapidated buildings. In Ontario, hospitals are better funded, but there is limited home care and no universal drug coverage. And, as you are well aware, Canada’s federally funded Aboriginal health system is plagued with major access issues,2 and Nunavut’s only hospital has failed to meet minimum accreditation standards.

There have been glimmers of hope. In 2000, in response to public pressure, the First Ministers put forth a vision for health care, which was augmented through health accords in 2003 and 2004.3,4 Systemic changes were urged, including re-forming primary care and providing greater access to primary care practitioners, increasing the number of health practitioners, decreasing wait times, developing home care services, implementing a program to provide universal access to medications modelled on Quebec’s program or our national medicare system and improving the reporting of health outcomes. Subsequently, health care cash transfers to the provinces increased from $16.5 billion in 2006 to $24 billion by 2009/10 (plus substantial tax point transfers).

Five years later, the federal government has written cheques to the provinces, but the gains are at best modest. Wait times for many procedures have not decreased substantially in many jurisdictions. There are major shortages of health professionals. And we are still waiting for a nationwide drug benefit and national indicators to ensure accountability. Canadians need reform that will improve primary care access and health outcomes.

The reason for limited progress is an erosion of national leadership in health. Successive federal governments have either decreased investments or, through inaction, allowed health to be a purely provincial matter. Despite the importance of health in the minds of the voting public, we remain very concerned that health has slipped entirely off the federal agenda.

While we trust that your government will continue to act in the public interest, paying some of the bills is not good enough. We urge you and your government to provide real leadership by enforcing the Canada Health Act and acting on decisions emanating from the health accords. Further delays will only mean that more Canadians will suffer. Our nation’s health depends on you.

Explanation:

here is your answer Hope you will enjoy and mark me as brainlist

thank you

You might be interested in
Answer all of these questions and you will get the brain list
Musya8 [376]

Answer:

proper noun

george washington

united states

2)movie for u

3 0
3 years ago
HELP PLS!!!!! (I didn't read the book I really need to answer this) :)​
Alex
Faber gives Montag a seashell radio-like device in order to overhear Montag's conversations with Captain Beatty, so he can instruct him with what to say. Faber considers himself a coward.
4 0
3 years ago
What would u change about yourself if u could
shtirl [24]

Answer: that I wouldn’t be so cold hearted all the time or at least act like it

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"Listen carefully and answer."
zysi [14]
Listen carefully and answer, it has correct grammar as listen carefully to answer doesn’t make sense.
5 0
3 years ago
Which sentence uses a prepositional phrase correctly?
serious [3.7K]

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

A prepositional phrase can be defined as a phrase consists of a preposition and the object it affects. The object can be either noun, gerund, or clause.

The sentence that correctly uses a prepositional phrase is option D. The prepositional phrase in the sentence is 'to prepare for tryouts.' The rest of the options are incorrect as they do not make any sense.

Therefore, option D ic correct.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • It is important to fall the rules of capitalization because
    7·1 answer
  • While Gromer claims that Arthur has done him great harm, what can we infer from the line, "The
    8·1 answer
  • Whats your dream college (this is for school for a poll)
    10·2 answers
  • 20 POINTS !!!
    14·2 answers
  • Drag the appropriate punctuation, comma or dash, to each box. Everyone's favorite teacher _____ he won the award for best teache
    8·1 answer
  • How are the reasons and evidence of an argument similar?
    12·2 answers
  • 6. My grandfather is the sun and the moon to me.
    14·2 answers
  • What is the meaning of Moral Decadence as a theme in Literature
    11·1 answer
  • SOS i need help on my English homework
    8·1 answer
  • Based on your knowledge of affixes, what does endocrinology mean?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!