Answer:
The first answer is an "adjective", the second answer is "software", and the last one is "safe from attack"
Explanation:
The question above does not present the text to which it refers. This makes it impossible for me to show you an answer. However, I will show you how you can find the answer you need.
First, you will need to read the text to which the question refers. This reading will be able to show you how the bank clerk is behaving, his thoughts, and the emotions he is expressing. This will be able to show you the emotional state of that character.
This because:
- Emotional state refers to how the character is mentally.
- This state is revealed through the behavior and the way the character is expressing his feelings.
Thus, if the bank clerk is acting calmly and expressing feelings that reflect this tranquility, it is because he is in a calm emotional state.
Otherwise, if the character is sad, expressing anger, or any other negative feeling, it means he is in an equally negative emotional state. Likewise, if he displays happy behaviors, expresses joy, love, and any happy feelings, it means he is happy and positive.
More information:
brainly.com/question/14990686?referrer=searchResults
Cuase and edfect andnifkdls
Answer:
It mirrors or reflects objects or a scene back. It simply throws up a reflection of whatever happens to be situated just in front of it. ... The mirror is impartial in what is reflected back. It is only when meaning is assigned to what is reflected back, that we begin to find out who is the fairest of us all.
Answer:
First, one has to be clear about what we are talking about. In a pure democracy, the people simply decide together what they are going to do. The rule of law matters a little but not terribly much in that situation since if there are any disagreements about what we all agreed to, we simply get back together and decide again. In practice, of course, a pure democracy does not work for anything more than a very small group.
What we generally mean is a representative democracy, or a republic. This means that there are certain people elevated to positions of authority and decision-making for society (temporarily) based on democratic selection. What makes their power temporary? What ensures that they only exercise the power they are supposed to? What prevents any of these people from becoming dictators? We may want to say that they only have the powers that we grant them democratically but ultimately those individuals in power are the ones that control the process. Democracy at a large scale, even with respect to just elections, only works if there are established procedures that are strictly followed. The principle of the rule of law means that at the most basic level we all agree that the laws as written down are what “rule” everything and everybody. Nobody can change that fact. So if some individual chooses to say they have some god-like authority, our society as a whole will not follow them because we all agree the Constitution supersedes their opinion about any authority they believe they should have. It is a fundamental social contract that we all share that makes our laws work and makes it theoretically impossible for somebody to become a dictator. Without this implicit social contract, the Constitution and the laws mean nothing.
NOTE: We tend to associate other ideas like “equality before the law”, “civil rights”, and other ideals with the rule of law. While the rule of law can help enable these things, they are not the same thing nor are they specifically part of the rule of law. The rule of law can allow and even enable inequality before the law (as it did in the Roman Empire) and a variety of other things we consider wrong. In fact the rule of law does not even have anything to do with democracy at all. It is simply a principle that allows a stable, functioning society by establishing that we all have to live by the agreed-upon standards. But as stated, a representative democracy cannot function without it.
Explanation:
