Okay well since this is an unfinished question, I will just tell you about the report and Cabeza de Vaca.
Alvar Nuñez Cabeça de Vaca was one of four survivors of the expedition to Florida commanded by Pánfilo Narvaez. He spent eight years with the native tribes of the Texas-Northern Mexico region learning their languages and customs. Six of the eight years were spent in the vicinity of Galveston Island as a trader between tribes. Cabeza de Vaca, as an outsider, could carry out mutually beneficial trade between tribes that were at war with each other. When he and the three others left the Galveston area they functioned as faith healers among the natives.
When Cabeza de Vaca and the others reached the Spanish Empire outpost of Culiacan thousands of miles away on the west coast of Mexico in what is now the state of Sinaloa.
After of period of recovery in Culiacan, Cabeza de Vaca and the others traveled on to the city Guadalajara and from there to Mexico City. Many Spanish Empire officials recognized that Cabeza de Vaca's experience would make him extremely valuable on any future expeditions into the interior of North America. He knew several native languages and understood the cultures. Cabeza de Vaca himself wanted to go back and bring the native tribes into the Spanish Empire and convert them to Christianity by humane and enlightened means. But Cabeza de Vaca that if he were to carryout the spread of Christianity and Spanish civilization by humane means it could only occur if he were the leader of the expedition.
He undertook a perilous journey back to Spain to seek his appointment by the King to the leadership of another expedition. Unfortunately for Cabeza de Vaca and for the natives the King had already appointment Hernando de Soto to lead the next expedition. De Soto asked Cabeza de Vaca to join his expedition but Cabeza de Vaca refused. De Soto was a soldier, an accomplished military leader, and was not likely to give much credence to Cabeza de Vaca's concern for humaneness and fairness.
The King offered Cabeza de Vaca the leadership of an expedition to explore the northeastern part of North America but Cabeza de Vaca turned it down. However the King did appoint Cabeza de Vaca to leadership of an expedition but not in North America. The Spanish colony in the region of the Rio de la Plata in South America was in trouble. The Governor of the colony was missing and feared dead. Cabeza de Vaca was to go to Rio de la Plata area and seek out the missing governor and if that governor was dead Cabeza de Vaca was to take his place as governor.
Answer:
literary work is: Composition
There are two truths in this passage, and, unfortunately, they do not coincide.There is the author's truth and there is a mother's truth.
No mother in her right mind would say that her son was lucky because he did not have to kill a conscript, but the author feels that way. War is a terrible thing. It is premised on on the notion that the "team" that can inflict the most damage or kill the most number of the enemy is the winner. The rules are, there are no rules. Anything goes.
So the first sentence I would pick would be the one beginning. "I thank my God he did not have to do it..." That is the author's point of view.
The second sentence I would choose is "What you got black on for ...? " This may not be what your marker is looking for, but on principle I would pick it. She is saying "We should not mourn his death. We shouldn't celebrate it either. The only good thing is that his death meant that someone else didn't die."
This last sentence is the hardest to justify. Most women I know couldn't live with the unnecessary death of a child. But the author could. He could say that such a death was needless and pointless, and should not be mourned.
I think its because the roads where dangerous and broken
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
There is no question here. It is just a statement.
Furthermore, you did not specify if this statement belongs to a novel, a play, a movie, or what?
It is so difficult to help you without the question and the proper references.
However, trying to help you, we can infer that you are talking about the ghost in the play "Hamlet," written by English author William Shakespeare.
Being that the case, yes, the appearance of the ghost helps create an eerie mood and grabs the audience's attention. Shakespeare, being the expert writer he was, knew how to create suspense in the readers. As the ghost does not speak, this adds mystery and suspense to people's minds. The audience would probably want to know more about the ghost in the king's clothes and ist purpose to appear. Most people could think that the ghost is there because it has issues to resolve.
