1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bija089 [108]
2 years ago
10

How decisive was the United States in World War II?

History
1 answer:
Marina CMI [18]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The USA was one of the greatest powers no one really wanted to get USA involved. USA joined in 1941, 2 years after the British and the French started. USA got all the credit really because they had a lot more factories and the built the atomic bomb. But really the British were the most engaged allied power. The USA was decisive in WW2 because they had a lot more of materials etc weapons planes tanks warships

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Who proposed the theory that mental processes originated in the brain?
vesna_86 [32]
B because he studied it and made it 

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which event is an example of science helping engineering?
sasho [114]

Answer: I'm not 100% sure about this one but I think it's D. Satellite imaging allows people to map the extent of forest fires.

5 0
2 years ago
What did most freed slaves do during the period immediately following the Civil War
kotykmax [81]

One of the immediate aftermaths of the civil war by slaves was that slaves in the South seized land from their slave owners; however federal troops returned the land to the white owners. Hundreds and thousands of slaves freed after the civil war after the civil war died out of diseases and hunger after being liberated. Union soldiers neglected freed slaves who faced widespread outbreaks of cholera and smallpox while others starved to death.  It is estimated that a quarter of the four million slaves died either out of diseases or starvation. Several slaves knew nothing except for their lives of servitude on the plantations and, with their newfound freedom, couldn't find new opportunities thus opted to remain on these farms.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which organelle, found in this plant cell, breaks down sugars for cellular energy?
stiks02 [169]
Mitochondria breaks down sugars for cellular energy!

Hope this helps!
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In a brief to the Supreme Court of Oregon, you cite the 1985 Supreme Court of Washington case Larry Daugert, Trustee for David M
dolphi86 [110]

Answer:

Regarding the case of Daugert vs. Pappas; the Supreme Court must be informed that John Pappas and his firm were found guilty of malpractice, due to extra temporal request to review an appeal, on a case that was previously ruled in favor of his former client.  His negligence conducted to his former client to assume costs, previously overruled by the Court.   Main considerations for this case evaluation were the chances of the appeal reversion, as estimated by the Jury

Explanation:

Background

The attorney John Pappas was working for <em>Mountain Development Company (MDC)</em>.  <em>Black Mountain Ranch (BMR)</em>, a commercial entity, bought a recreation complex from MDC.  <u>Several deficiencies appeared in the construction</u> and both parties tried to resolved who should be in charge of repairing costs, without agreement.  

As a solution, both proposed an agreement, with an external advisor evaluating the situation (Anvil Corporation).  When Anvil concluded its investigation, indicated that <u>all defects were caused by a faulty design made by MDC</u>.  MDC then rejected those findings, and also, refused to pay for the corrections.  To this, BMR responded with a lawsuit against MDC, indicating an agreement breach.

At the end of trial, the Court assigned the blame not to MDC, but BMR, <u>pointing that lack of maintenance </u>resulted in degradation of the infrastructure.  BMR then filed an appeal, indicating that, since there was no wrong intention proved, <u>the agreement was biding.  </u>

MDC asked its attorney, <em>John Pappas</em>, to request a review to the Court; but <u>this request was presented a day after finishing the valid period to receive the request.</u>  Considering this, the developer lost any chance of defending themselves against the appeal, and <em>the Court failed in favor of BMR.  </em>

Summarizing, the lawsuit that initially was provided by Court in favor of MCD, was later lost because their attorney did not requested a review, in the given time.  

As consequence, MCD, represented by Larry Daugert, presented a suit against Pappas, alleging malpractice.  

Daugert vs. Pappas.

Pappas and his firm were accused by Daugert of<em> breach of duty,</em> causing MDC to lost a case that was ruled in their favor, due to an extra temporal appeal review request.

During trial, <u>allegations were made based on the chances of dismissal of the appeal if the review request would have been accepted.</u>  Judge considered this an issue <em>to be ruled by Jury,</em> indicating them that:

  1. There could be a chance that the malpractice from Pappas affected the final outcome against MDC.
  2. The chance of the Supreme Court to accept the review and reversed the appeal outcome.
  3. The percentage of avoiding damage lost by MDC due to Pappas malpractice.  

Finally, the Jury calculated in 20% the changes of the Supreme Court to review and reverse the appeal, meaning that Daugert was able to prove malpractice performed by Pappas.  

Main elements resulting of this trial

The main element used to rule malpractice is <u>how close are the actions </u>of the professional to create a negative result for its customer (proximity cause).  On this case, the attorney failed to present a review in time, affecting his customer.  This is the main justification provided to fail against Pappas, and used to define malpractice.  

<u>Also, considering that requesting the Jury to provide probabilities of the scenarios</u> indicated by the Judge could have been considered out of rule, this was made in base of the client’s needs, and the legal profession.  This, in order to provide a perspective of this proximity cause, for the Jury.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Zhou Dynasty ended in
    7·2 answers
  • MC)Which of these took place in the Philippines soon after the Spanish-American War ended?
    12·2 answers
  • Discussion Details
    10·1 answer
  • Which action is an example of an implied power of Congress? A. passing a tax law B. establishing the Bank of the United States C
    13·2 answers
  • How did confucianism help to define relationships between family members and social classes in ancient china?​
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement is true of the ancient Olympics?
    7·1 answer
  • among the following where would you not find tikis ? reunion, the marques islands, Hawaii or easter island?
    15·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the Spanish Inquisition? a. to expel all Muslim spies from the country b. to reveal and stop church corr
    14·2 answers
  • In addition to entering the workforce, what role did American women play in World War 2?
    10·2 answers
  • Describe why American Indians living in Oklahoma were unable to capitalize on the oil boom. Was any tribe an exception?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!