1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alexeev081 [22]
3 years ago
6

Qué importancia tiene lo mítico en la actualidad

History
1 answer:
Studentka2010 [4]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

En casi todas las religiones, los dioses, seres primigenios y creadores de la naturaleza, son los responsables de que exista la cultura humana. A veces los mitos explican el surgimiento de la cultura como forma de trascender lo natural, en este caso son las acciones prodigiosas de los dioses las que la hacen surgir.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Does anyone have gost of tsunami training to look for people to play with this Friday playstation ​
Pani-rosa [81]
What’s that game about
8 0
3 years ago
Write two ways that state governments are like the federal government. (2 sentences)
MariettaO [177]

Answer:

I don't really understand the Question but

Explanation:

Most Americans have more daily contact with their state and local governments than with the federal government. Police departments, libraries, and schools — not to mention driver’s licenses and parking tickets — usually fall under the oversight of state and local governments. Each state has its own written constitution, and these documents are often far more elaborate than their federal counterpart. The Alabama Constitution, for example, contains 310,296 words — more than 40 times as many as the U.S. Constitution.

8 0
3 years ago
The cases of Miranda v. Arizona, Mapp v. Ohio, and Gideon v. Wainwright are all related to which of the following? (5 points)
pogonyaev

Answer:

criminal investigation and court procedures

Explanation:

The common factor between the Mapp vs Ohio, Miranda vs Arizona and Gideon vs Wainwright was that they were all criminal investigation and court procedures.

In the Miranda vs Arizona case, the court ruled that the incriminating statements made by the accused were only admissible in court if the police informed the suspect of his Miranda rights first.

In the Mapp vs Ohio case, the court ruled that evidence obtained through violation of the Fourth Amendment which has to do with unlawful searches and seizures were not admissible in court.

During the Gideon vs Wainwright case, the court ruled that the states were bound by the Sixth Amendment to produce a lawyer for an accused if he cannot afford one.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was an INDIRECT RESULT of the Crusades on Europe
inn [45]
<span>decline of scientific and medical knowledge</span>
4 0
4 years ago
Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
hram777 [196]

Answer:

Plato

Explanation:

i took the test

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Proclamation of 1763 prohibited colonists from moving to land
    6·1 answer
  • why is it that every time you give a boy the signs you need to talk and they act like they dont get the signs
    10·1 answer
  • Who was under comand during the revolutionary war in the American navy?
    12·2 answers
  • What is socialism?
    11·1 answer
  • Write down the review of the following :- the relationship between the U.S. and the Middle East from the 1970s to the present •
    5·1 answer
  • Independent european traders who lived among the native americans
    6·1 answer
  • How does a person become a U.S. citizen according to the rule of jus sanguinis?
    5·1 answer
  • 1. How did Stalin begin his career under Lenin? What is his personality like?
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement BEST describes the early years of the reign of the Mauryan emperor Ashoka?
    7·2 answers
  • Find five facts of interest about what the christian church today teaches and the challenges they face from society.
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!