1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mash [69]
3 years ago
12

Is the tradition of allowing a senator to reject the governor's appointment?

History
1 answer:
lara31 [8.8K]3 years ago
8 0
The tradition of allowing a senator to reject the governor's appointment of a political enemy from the senator's district. the executive power to reject a proposed law unless an unusual majority of the legislature (usually two-thirds) votes to override the governor's opposition.
You might be interested in
21 points to who answers
pantera1 [17]
I believe the answers are c and c... though i would suggest double checking
5 0
3 years ago
What was the primary way the farms in the South differed from those in the North?
DerKrebs [107]
I think it is B. The south was based on agriculture.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is the Supreme Court described as<br>the court of law?​
makkiz [27]

Answer OK so As the final arbiter of the law, the Court is charged with ensuring the American people the promise of equal justice under law and, thereby, also functions as guardian and interpreter of the Constitution.r: The supreme court is described as the court of law because: It holds more power than all other courts. If someone is not satisfied with the judgement of the high court or district court they can appeal to the supreme court. ... supreme court also advice president for the decisions. hope this helps have a great night ❤️❤️❤️

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
In which form of government do delegates speak on behalf of citizens?
Setler [38]
The answer is a representative form of government, where <span>delegates speak on behalf of citizens.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
What would life be like without the 1st Amendment?
Talja [164]

Answer:

Our lives would be ENTIRELY different. "The First Amendment states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” This shows that different religions would be unacceptable and freedom of speech wouldnt really be there. Hope this helps :)

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who killed jhon f kennedy
    12·1 answer
  • How are england and america the same
    11·1 answer
  • Why isn't punch card voting legal
    14·1 answer
  • Abraham lincoln was inaugurated 60 years after thomas jefferson. barack obama was inaugurated 208 years after jefferson. write a
    10·1 answer
  • Why does new mexico have varied climate?
    14·2 answers
  • Which statement about the Tang Dynasty is a factor other than an opinion
    9·1 answer
  • When did the Civil War start and end?
    5·2 answers
  • What does chiken mean
    11·1 answer
  • Which english reformer called for change in the church during the 1300s??
    14·2 answers
  • This is a test ill give 45 points for somebody that can do them all and tell me the answers
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!