Andrew Jackson tried to persuade people by stating that people were still savages. So their incorporation was a mistakes due to the government might have ruin their policies and fail. He considered legitimate to remove them from the territory since they were not capable of being like the rest of the people
The impact of the first-person narrator is it allows the reader with credential sources of information to get engaged with the concept.
<h3 /><h3>What is the narrator?</h3>
The narrator refers to the person who speaks about any event. In a poem, the speaker is known as the narrator. This will be the person who tells what happened in the particular story.
Readers feel more connected to characters when told in the first person. Due to the fact that the reader can see and hear everything the narrator does.
This makes the book more interesting to read and more relatable. The advantage of narrating a story in the first person is that readers can immediately experience a character's voice and personality.
Learn more about the narrator, here:
brainly.com/question/17415359
#SPJ1
Answer:
trhyrueursuertewewyretueww45 wh252p nikka
Explanation:
Who would be the correct version
The answer is A - negative capability. It is not a satire, because that means it is a mockery or ridicule of some sorts. It is not ambiguity either, because that means it doesn't have an obvious meaning, it isn't clear. "Hypocrisy" basically means pretending that you are something you are not. Thus, this leaves us with the only option - negative capability.
