It can be proven using objective evidence
Answer:
I think it's: loud and forceful.
Explanation:
That's what I'm thinking after reading it.
He constantly flips out on the off chance that anybody, even his significant other, meddles with his assets. Whenever he has chosen to lay out a destructive snare for the alcohol criminal, he appears to be joyous and intrigued by the harmed whiskey.
Answer:
She brought the hurricane victims so the listeners would hear their stories from their perspective.
Explanation:
Cheryl Corley was aware that describing the experiences the victims of the hurricane had from a third person perspective would not accurately convey the horrors the victims experienced so she had to include the interviews of the victims themselves so listeners would better the experience from the first person perspective.
When a story is being narrated in the third person narrative, that is another person describing events from a detached view the emotions are not properly captured and the 0erson simply describes it the way he sees it or thinks it happened. It is not an accurate way of describing events.
When narrating an experience in the first person, the person describes it exactly how it happened to them and how they felt when it was happening and how they felt after the event. It is a description based on the descriptor's experience.
Answer:
relaxed
Explanation:
i got it right on the test.
Ok I guess but what is the question
