Well you might want to organize your point first. Also, when you are giving a percentage, add it to the sentence because they don't need parentheses one organized. Before I give you and answer, where is this Spanish from because I am from Mexico and don't understand the others
Answer:
decir --->di
bailar ---> baila
abrir---> abre
poner --->pon
tener --->ten
hablar --->habla
comer --->come
Explanation:
En castellano, el imperativo familiar singular es formado con la <u>tercera persona en singular</u> Tú y el verbo conjugado en <u>tiempo presente modo indicativo</u>.
Esto lo diferencia del imperativo formal singular, donde se usa la <u>tercera persona en singular (formal) </u>Usted.
Entonces, el imperativo familiar singular para los siguientes verbos es:
decir ---> di (Tú)
bailar ---> baila (Tú)
abrir---> abre (Tú)
poner --->pon (Tú)
tener --->ten (Tú)
hablar --->habla (Tú)
comer --->come (Tú)
Answer: Parramore used made the essay more convincing because it made the reader feel as if it was something they already knew was bad.
Explanation:
Throughout the essay the words and language that Parramore used made the essay more convincing because it made the reader feel as if it was something they already knew was bad. For example she says in page 32-33 “Surveillance has a way of dehumanizing workers.” which is very convincing when the reader reads
(क) अभि + गम् + ल्यप् = अभिगम्य
(ख) वि + हा + ल्यप् = विहाय
(ग) निर् + गम् + ल्यप् = निर्गत्य
(घ) वि + हस् + ल्यप् = विहस्य
(ङ) प्र + क्लृप् (कृप्) + ल्यप् = प्रकृप्य
(च) सम् + बुध् + ल्यप् = सम्बुध्य
<h3 />
