Answer:
- Win because the U.S. Supreme Court and other courts have said the First Amendment does not protect reporters who break confidentiality promises.
Explanation:
As per the given description, Kennedy will 'win because the U.S. Supreme Court and other courts have said the First Amendment does not protect reporters who break confidentiality promises.' According to the laws, Jones is not allowed to reveal the confidential information of Kennedy. Since she broke this law of privacy and the promise she made to Kennedy, Kennedy is legally eligible and justifiable for suing Jones and winning the case.
Stronger and more durable
Refers to an argument based on false or exaggerated information
When looking at modernism, one who is used to reading poetry
that follows a timeline (or stream of consciousness), that contains literal
meanings (or obvious denotations), and an overall sense of completeness will be
quite frustrated. Modernism, thereby
modernist poetry, does little, if any, of that.
In fact, when one reads modernist poetry, one must read “into” a poem
and discover meanings that might not be too obvious and allow for disjointedness
that will leave one who is used to superficial (or passive) readings
confused. Thus, when one reads
modernist poetry, one must certainly read it actively as opposed to
passively. As such, the correct response
to this question is “B” in that modernist poetry is characterized by all of the
following except a tendency to encourage passive reading.
Explanation:
I am already following you
