Answer:
Eva would have been better off selecting the 20-year term policy.
Step-by-step explanation:
Base on the scenario been described in the question, Eva would have been better off selecting the 20-year term policy. This reason is because assuming Eva bought the 20-year term policy, she wont be paying the new charge of extra 40% to her premium rate, compared to when she bought the 10-year term policy then renew the policy for another ten years.
so you just add 3/8 and 3/4 and the answer is 1.125
Good question. Let's try this. How about People per meter squared. The average 2 bedroom apartment in the city near where I live is about 94 square meters. If there were say 100 people at a party in his home, then the number of people per square meter would be 100 / 94 = 1.06 people / square meter.
If however he called those in his home to join him for breakfast and 7 people responded then he would have 7 / 94 = 0.0745 people per m^2 When the number is this small, it might make sense to go the other way. (m^2 per person). 94/7 = 13.4 meters per person. That makes far more sense. It means that every person has 13.4 meters^2 that he could call his own.
