Answer: yes! There are many cases in which a writer would write something for different purposes.
Explanation:
Answer:
He sought to emphasize the historic nature of the events at Pearl Harbor, implicitly urging the American people never to forget the attack and memorialize its date.
Explanation:
Hope this helps! Have a nice day. :)
C is definitely correct, but i’m not sure if any of the others apply because i can only find an excerpt of “what is apartheid?”. I hope that helps at least a little
The correcte answer is: "to emphasize the threat posed by Japan"
Rossevelt asked that it be a short speech that did not exceed five hundred words and focused on the essential message to reach as many Americans as possible: that the United States had been attacked by Japan by surprise and without a previous declaration of war and that the United States was willing to defeat him no matter what it cost.
It emphasizes the savagery of the assassins’ actions toward Caesar. This is how Shakespeare’s use of the word slaughter rather than murder affect the meaning of the passage.
The word slaughter shows much more "rude" effect than the word murder. So, Shakespeare used this slaughter word so that readers can feel the brutality with which Caesar was killed.
Not only because he was stabbed several times, but also because one of the people who killed him was Brutus and also his death was agreed by a plot, not by something that Caesar has done.
Hence, the correct answer is Option C -It emphasizes the savagery of the assassins' actions toward Caesar.
Learn more about Julius Caesar on brainly.com/question/3718085
#SPJ4
