Answer:
B. lacking parallelism
Explanation:
The original sentence contains a predicate nominative (<em>singer</em>) and an action verb (<em>plays</em>), which shows lack of parallelism.
The best way to fix the error would be to use a parallel structure, which is the repetition of a certain grammatical form within a sentence:
"Shelia E. <em>sings </em>and<em> plays</em> the drums."
Now the sentence uses two action verbs <em>sings </em>and<em> plays</em> in the present tense, and this is an example of parallelism.
If you are suspicious of someone that means that you think they are involved in something bad.
The answer to this question would be false
An argumentative text claims that a certain opinion is the only valid opinion.
Two children were taken to the apple orchard on a fine day with their family. They picked a lot of apples, and had them all in a basket once they went home. Once at home, the parents told the children to each choose and apple to eat. The first child chose a glossy apple with a brilliant skin, which had no marks or dents. The second child chose a duller looking apple, with a couple of dents and some bruises. The first child bit into their Apple, only to find a worm had been their first. The worm left a tunnel in the Apple, and the child discarded the Apple. The second child bit into their Apple to find that it was very sweet, and had no worm inside. The children were careful about picking their apples from then on.
