<span>Tatiana's sister and brother-in-law visit "Paul" at the milles collines. because of the danger, they want to leave "Rwanda" and take "Tatiana" and the children with them. they feel paul is in no danger because he is a "Hutu", while they, tatiana, and the children are "Tutsi". paul says there is no danger as the "United Nations" and the "world press" are watching. later, paul is driving home and hears gunfire, shouting and glass breaking. buildings are burning. when he arrives, his family and "neighbors" are hiding in the dark. there are no "lights" on. they say there is a "rumor" that "President Habyarimana" has been "murdered", and "Tutsi rebels" have killed him. paul says this is "nonsense".</span>
I havent studied law in a long while, but pretty sure its B
A primary source is a source from the relevant time, done by someone who actually witnessed the event, not a source made later.
A primary source for a reasons of an event would be for example an opinion of a person from the time, so for example an opinion of a soldier of why they choose to participate in the war: best expressed in his own words, such as in a letter.
Answer:
A) fixed-ratio
Explanation:
The fixed ratio is the ratio that represents the reinforcement schedule. Here the delivery of the reinforcement could be done when the number of responses is completed and finished
Since in the given situation, it is mentioned that a toddler has learned about the jack and it wont be operate till she turns the hand crank approx and exact 10 mins
So this situation represents the fixed ratio
hence, the correct option is A