Option A. If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:
A. misunderstand the intended meaning of historical actions.
<h3>What does it mean to take things out of context?</h3>
This is used to refer to the fact that a person is taking what is being said outside of the meaning that the message is supposed to convey. It has to do with not being able to understand what is said and interpreting it accordingly.
In this situation, when the historian takes things out of their context, then it means that they would not understand the true meaning of the happenings of that period.
Read more on historical events here: brainly.com/question/17040564
#SPJ1
Answer:
Low standards of education for black people's children.
Explanation:
There will be large differences between schools if the Supreme Court had not disprove “separate but equal” in the Brown decision because the schools where black children gets education is not of high standard as compared to the schools where white people's children get education. There are more chances for the white children in the field as compared to black children due to unequal standards of education. There will be high racial discriminations in the society among black and white people.
Answer:
b Spain and the Netherlands
