Answer:
b Cold command
Explanation:
Percy Bysshe Shelley's (1792–1822) poem "Ozymandias" is as a whole situational and verbal irony. Cold command is situational irony that because of the king's statue present condition or situation, it is in no position to give a command. The reader too does not expect any command from a half-sunk statue with a shattered visage and trunkless legs. The statue's condition described before and after this phrase makes it clear that king and his kingdom is ruined so he cannot command.
Situational Irony is a literary device in which something happens that is very different from what is normally expected.
Irony is a literary device in which some thing said or happened is opposite to what is expected.
Editing the literature is the answer. When you criticize something you do not edit it in any way.
I believe that the answer to the question provided above is that <span> Macbeth comply with native ethical traditions, according to Kermode by understanding the culture of the native and respecting it as its own.</span>
Hope my answer would be a great help for you. If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.
Answer:
<h3>This advancement would no doubt firstly give many people to live longer on earth.</h3>
Explanation:
- The ability to slow or even stop aging would be the a breakthrough discovery in the history of mankind. Though humans have vast and endless potential, aspirations, and desires, time and age is always limited.
- Therefore, many scientist and other professionals are trying to discover a way to sustain and prolong human lives. If such discovery is made, there would be both pros and cons in this advancement.
- This advancement would no doubt firstly help people to live longer on earth. People would be able to achieve their desires and aspirations without being worried of getting old. People would also be able to spend time more time and years with their loved ones.
- However, this advancement could be dangerous in some ways. The earth will get populated rapidly as people won't die of old age. Thereby disrupting the cycle of life on earth. There will be fight for resources and position on earth. People would hold their positions and resources for a longer period of time denying opportunity to many.
- No, science should not continue to pursue this research because it would disrupt the natural cycle of life on earth.
I think B is the closest, but honestly I wouldn't even have the comma there.
