1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Neporo4naja [7]
2 years ago
11

Why did the United States lose its superiority on the seas?

History
2 answers:
solmaris [256]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

In 2005, a U.S. Navy plan was forwarded to Congress: It entailed reducing force structure and transforming to a capabilities-based forward force posture. However, the Navy continued to pursue unattainable force levels and, today, has lost command of the seas to China in the Western Pacific. China’s pace of war is the speed of light through cyberspace, leaving U.S. forces blind and deaf, while America’s is 30 knots, taking weeks to arrive at the fight. A fundamental shift in mindset needs to be made. The focus should no longer be on the number of hulls, but on a return to the plan for a capabilities-based, more forward force posture, primarily by commanding cyberspace in order to regain command of the seas.

erica [24]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Naval planners were dazzled by the new technology; they figured that by incorporating more revolutionary capabilities into their shipbuilding, they could build fewer hulls with smaller crews. ... Together, the many failures constitute a lost generation of shipbuilding.

Explanation:

btw pls mark brainliest

You might be interested in
The united states is a good example of a country using direct democracy. true or false
lara31 [8.8K]
This is both true and false the United States is a federal constitutional presidential republic. It is a joining of fifty smaller subject republic's known as states, they and the federal government imitate the Roman res publica style of government which is a further advancement of the Greek style. However the United States elects everyone in a similar manner by direct popular vote. This is the case with Governors, Representatives and Senators for the State legislatures and the United States Congress. The president is elected in a combination of the two. The populous votes for the person who they want to be president. After each state tallies its majority vote that States electoral college votes go to the winner of the majority in that state. It is very rare that a president wins both the electoral college and the popular votes. The electoral college decides the next president not the popular despite both being integrally connected to each other. This system ensures that States with a larger population cannot control the executive branch of the United States.
6 0
3 years ago
Why do citizens get to vote at the age of 18
docker41 [41]
Amendment XXVI right to vote at age 18 the right of citizens of the united states who are 18 years of age or older to vote shall not be denied or abridged 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these ideas would supporters of the Plessy v. Ferguson ruling most likely have agreed with?
Sladkaya [172]
The answer would be “that ‘separate but equal’ was a valid legal doctrine”. This is because this ruling upheld the constitutionality of segregation under the premise that as long as things were “equal” for African Americans then they could be separate.
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
President Kennedy's administration was known for promoting civil rights.<br> a. True<br> b. False
Arisa [49]
Yes, it is true that <span>President Kennedy's administration was known for promoting civil rights, since this administration was pivotal in enforcing things like the desegregation of schools. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
g Liberal theorists argued, prior to World War I, that war seemed obsolete in part because countries could not afford it. Their
Irina18 [472]

Answer:

Pacifism

Explanation:

As Eric Hobsbawm explained in <em>The Age of Extremes</em>, World War I happened when the European Empires were crumbling and falling into pieces. Liberal theorists opposed to war as a means of Empires to gain power over others. The economic costs clearly disfavored war but there were also the ethical and moral aspects that gained momentum prior to WW I. These aspects materialised again in the 70s (Vietnam war) when more people started to protest against the human costs of war.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • This political cartoon focuses on the reparations
    11·2 answers
  • Which statements give causes of civil unrest in the United States in the 1960s?
    5·2 answers
  • Why would an imperial country be interested in other countries? Mark all that apply
    8·2 answers
  • Which steps should one take when creating a personal budget?
    8·1 answer
  • What kinds of resources or assistance would be most important to former slaves in order to live as free and equal citizens?
    6·1 answer
  • after the continental congress voted for independence on July 1, 1776, why did Edward Rutledge of South Carolina ask that anothe
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!
    11·2 answers
  • Which term is incorrectly matched with a definition?
    11·2 answers
  • A country engaged in brinkmanship would refuse to engage an enemy in combat following an attack. maintain a position of strength
    7·1 answer
  • Pls answer ASAPOne major problem for Russia since the fall of the Soviet Union has been:
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!