Answer:
A secondary source summarizes large amounts of evidence.
Explanation:
Primary sources correspond to “primary literature” and are those that present themselves and are disseminated exactly as they are produced by their authors. Primary sources are original materials on which other research is based. This type of source presents the information in its original form, without interpretation, summarization or evaluation by other writers.
On the other hand, secondary sources are interpretations and evaluations of primary sources for this reason present a series of evidences that support their interpretations. In this sense, secondary sources may be more useful than a primary source.
It is a metaphor, meaning you are spectuacular. (from usa at least)
Early humans eventually formed hunter-gatherer societies so catching food and cooking it could be split evenly between the people, and so everyone could get food properly, all the while sharing with eachother and looking out for eachother. Being in groups made it easier to catch more food, because they could take out more than they could together than with only one person. Forming these societies made things much more easy and efficient for them.
Hello. You have not indicated which text the question refers to. This makes it impossible for the question to be answered efficiently and satisfactorily.
However, a section called "The Holocaust" should provide context for a line that refers to the cruelty that the Nazis inflicted on Jews, Poles, Sigans, prisoners of war and other people who were persecuted and subjugated by Nazis, especially Jews who were almost exterminated during the holocaust.
In this case, to find the answer to your question, you need to read the opening text and find the section that points to these elements.
Answer:
China is the answer for the question.
