Answer: It is relevant and sufficient, because she gives convincing examples of how phones support classwork.
Explanation:
Parvati's argument in favor of using cell phones in class is valid and sufficient. The evidence she presents is strong - she claims that cell phones are useful research tools that enable us to find the right piece of information. She also provides specific examples and even explains a situation in her class where cell phones were used. This makes her argument convincing, because she supports her claim with solid evidence.
i dunno you tell me pl because i have this question too
The answer is A, the fragile, expensive ornament was smashed by the clumsy man.
Answer: C. To describe unethical reporting practices during the Gilded Age, and how they are similar to reporting today.
Explanation:
This is based on an article about reporting in the Gilded Age by Randall S. Sumpter. Randall talks about how the internet has made the journalism scene so saturated and competitive that reporters sometimes engaged in unethical practices to get by.
Mr. Sumpter then likened this to the Gilded Age where reporters did the same thing because just like now, there was a lot of competition then and journalists did whatever they could - no matter how unethical - to ensure that they were successful.