1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]
3 years ago
13

By physically committing an act of robbery, the defendant has satisfied which of the requirement of ______ necessary for a convi

ction.
Law
1 answer:
adoni [48]3 years ago
8 0

The defendant has satisfied the requirement of actus reus necessary for a conviction.

Actus reus is a legal term for the act or omission that constitutes the crime itself in many completed criminal cases. Actus reus usually presupposes intent (mens rea) to constitute a crime, with which, for example, reflex actions with unfortunate consequences are not included in the term.

Thus, actus reus is the material component (the physical commission) of the crime, the set of criminal actions carried out by the defendant.

Learn more in brainly.com/question/3065381

You might be interested in
Hey so...legality question...if someone has the time and knowledge
lakkis [162]

Answer:

I felt that dude. I have similar problems with my mom (not gonna say what).

It starts counting as an actual threat when it is repeated and continuously said. Also if he has the actual capabilities of doing so and begins to act on them.

If you can, when he is calm- maybe ease into asking him about it. See what he says.

I don't know if you have a mom, parents are divorced, whatever it is- but if you can speak to your mother about it, I would try.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ozzy recently started working at a new company. He has been solicited several times to join the union of the company, but he wou
Ne4ueva [31]

Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:

Ozzy recently started working at a new company. He has been solicited several times to join the union of the company, but he would prefer not to. The union officials tell Ozzy that he won’t be allowed to keep working unless he joins the union. Which of the following is true?

-The union officials are pretending they have a closed shop and can't influence Ozzy's decision.  

-The union can't make Ozzy join the union, but it can require him to pay union dues.  

-Ozzy must now join the union because union shops are always legal.  

-Ozzy's requirement to join the union depends on his state of employment.

Answer:

-The union can't make Ozzy join the union, but it can require him to pay union dues.  

Explanation:

There is a law called the National Labor Relations Act that states that no employee should be required to be part of the union and that membership in the union should not be placed as a requirement for the occupation of a particular labor function. However, some states and some companies may adopt different approaches to their employees and the union.

 In some states in the country, although an employee is not required to become a member of a union, they allow an obligation for all employees to be required to pay at least part of the union's dues. In this case, we can say that in relation to the case shown in the question above, the union can't make Ozzy join the union, but it can require him to pay union dues.

7 0
4 years ago
You are driving on a two lane highway and the vehicle behind you wants to pass. You should
Anarel [89]
Always slow down by five too ten miles per hour to make it easier for them to pass.
8 0
3 years ago
A crime has been committed on a popular college campus. Police have suspicions about who committed the crime, but a professor na
zlopas [31]

Answer:

18-year-old John, a tall, muscular football player who weighs in at 170 lbs would be the suspect where Sheldon MOST likely pinpoint for the crime.

4 0
2 years ago
The critical concept that emerged in the palko decision is that of ________ rights.
Lelu [443]

Answer:

Double Jeopardy right

Explanation:

This clause has it that is prohibited for a person to be convicted for the same crime more than once. This is a fifth amendment clause that was developed following the palko v Connecticut case. Palko had being charged for first degree murder but he got second degree sentence. The state of Connecticut filed an appeal against him and won the appeal. He was therefore sentenced to death

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement about greenhouse gas emissions is supported by the pie chart? More carbon dioxide is emitted in the United State
    7·2 answers
  • What is the burden of proof? Why is it important in both civil and criminal cases?
    5·1 answer
  • What will happen to you if you break the law in north korea?
    12·1 answer
  • "Did the appellate court agree with the trial court's order that Case Western must issue a diploma to Amir Al-Dabagh
    10·1 answer
  • A defective product is one that has a manufacturing defect, lacks directions or instructions or has a defective design that resu
    15·1 answer
  • Please help I am confused
    5·1 answer
  • An act under the other acts exception must have occurred
    10·1 answer
  • Think about coverage you’ve seen of high-profile crimes or court cases. What do you think is helpful about media coverage of the
    9·1 answer
  • (PLEASE HELP ASAP) Outline each part and purpose of the US criminal justice system. Is there one purpose that seems nobler than
    14·1 answer
  • There is really weird people on here so please dont click on any links that people send saying this is the link to the answer
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!