Answer:
A) One way in which industrialization changed social classes in the period from 1750 to 1900 CE is the fact that industrialization increased the social class divide between the middle and upper class and the lower classes. Industrialization benefited the middle and upper classes more than anyone else, therefore increasing the gap between the classes.
B) One way in which industrialization resulted in new roles for women in the period from 1750 to 1900 CE is that it opened up a lot more job opportunities for women, as the workforce was growing rapidly, and needed many more workers than previously required. This forced a lot of companies to open up jobs to women, shifting their previously given role as purely wives and mothers to providers of the household. This was really only the beginning, as women were given more and more roles over the years, mostly thanks to industrialization opening up more opportunities.
C) One way in which industrialization caused changes to cities in the period from 1750 to 1900 CE is that it heavily increased the population, thus creating a larger urban population and attracting more business. The increased population and business within cities allowed technology and industry to really thrive, as with more business, it’s more likely for a city to be well-funded. In short, because of industrialization, it allowed countries to urbanize, as in move more people to the city, increasing industry and making cities an increasingly viable option for economic opportunity. Industrialization completely changed the way cities were viewed.
Explanation:
The articles of confederation are the document that was unanimously adopted in 1781 and gave most of the governing power to the states. The continental congress accepted the articles of confederation which is the first constitution of the united states, on November 15, 1777. On the other hand, approval of the articles of confederation by all thirteen states did not happen until March 1, 1781.
I believe the Martin Luther did because he gave the USA equal rights. Without him, there would still be segragation
