Answer:But, ardent New Dealer though Johnson may have been, he realized that the 1960s were dramatically different from the 1930s. If the New Deal was about security and disengagement from the labor force through such devices as retirement pensions, unemployment compensation, and pensions for the worthy poor, the Great Society, in contrast, was about opportunity and labor force participation
Explanation:
The correct answer here is B. that is the second option.
The conservation movement is a movement with the goal of protecting the nature, both flora and fauna and their habitats for the generations to come and enjoy. The conservation movement in contrasts to more traditional environmental movements mostly in the US seeks to protect nature but in order for it to be available for use sustainable use by the population. They are protecting the nature in order to keep using the natural resources.
Here is the match:
King Charles 1
<span>- wanted new taxes to crush rebellion in Scotland.
- </span><span> violated provisions of Petition of Right.
Parliament
- </span><span>. introduced Petition of Right.
- </span><span> refused to finance foreign wars.
The difference between King Charles I and the parliament led to the event that known as the English Civil Wars. The war ended up in Parliament's victory and King Charles was forced to re-sign the petition of right that he abolished.</span>
Answer:
C.) While both the Ottoman Empire and Western European states relied heavily on forced conversions to expand and maintain their empires, the Ottoman Empire remained more religiously tolerant than the Western European empires.
Explanation:
I got this question right on the first try. Here's why I knew it was C. You would need to have some knowledge about the Ottoman Empire's role of religion. I don't know if it says in the passage, so if you do find it, then give me a heads up. Remember, how did the Ottoman Empire treat the minorities? Did they force persecution/conversion to Islam? Well, not really. Although they did develop the devshirme system, it was kinda of a force conversion because the children had to give up their Christian belief, but it was seen as an opportunity. They weren't punished, so answer A is not right. So they did practice religious tolerance. Also the Ottoman Empire tried to expand the empire to make it bigger as well. There wasn't any religious wars carried out the Ottoman Empire, and answer B does not make sense. Where in the passage does it say about those two empires having efforts of doing mass conversions. Look at Source 2. Sorry if this explanation is long, but I hope this helps :)
Answer:
The amount of energy it takes on peoples labor to physically carry water back to their village and worrying about evaportation in hot weather which makes water transportation party weather dependant.
Looking for a clean source of water in the first place is also a tough one.
