Jim is trying to express to Huck that no matter what situation Huck is in he will grow from that experience and learn how to correctly place himself him culture and society and in doing so will create a environment that will be more suited to him. But this setting will crumble just like any environment that you are surrounded by. In saying this he is telling Huck that in order to live life to the fullest he must go with the flow and accept the environment around him in order to truly experience life in the fullest.
1. After Brian pulled out the porcupine quills, he started to cry.
2. His most important rule is that feeling sorry for yourself didn't work as it can't make fire or pull out the porcupine quills.
3. Fire needs oxygen to live.
4. "The main character in Hatchet, Brian Robeson, is a thirteen-year-old boy from New York City. This novel primarily deals with themes of man and nature as well as of self-awareness and self-actualization, mainly through Brian's experiences living alone in the wilderness. Therefore, he is essentially the only principal character. Brian's parents have just recently divorced, and this conflict between them has deeply affected Brian and his sense of stability. His sense of self has been disrupted by his parents' split, and he bears the burden of "The Secret," that is, the knowledge that his mother is having an affair with another man." According to Spark Notes. I haven't read Hatchet in years lol
5. Food (like the berries), the lake (for water), fire (warmth)
6. The 20 dollar bill was useless to get him out of the wilderness.
Answer:
I see what you're saying about...
Answer:
This case involves a federal death sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Fields for conviction of a federal capital offense. Fields was sentenced to death largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could confidently predict Fields would be dangerous in the future. The psychiatrist testified that he did not know of any "standard psychiatric or medical procedures used in arriving at a determination or predicting future dangerousness" and that he was unaware of specific empirical data or studies. He issued his opinion without engaging in any testing or any other objective measures or use of an actuarial method. His basis for this opinion was discussions with the prosecutors and review of some records regarding the defendant. The defense attorney objected to the testimony as unreliable under the standards for expert testimony established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceutical (i.e., that proffered evidence must be grounded in scientific reasoning or methodology). The district court overruled the objections and allowed the expert testimony to go to the jury.
Explanation:
Answer:
The word which doesn't belong in the glossary of a lesson on democracy in this case would be memorize. Democracy, election, government all are words, on the other hand, which are important and should be mentioned when one's talking about democracy.
Explanation:
<h2 />
<u><em>VERIFIED BY BRAINLY</em></u>
