Answer:
The Third Estate had recently made demands of the king and had demanded that the commoners have more of a say in government. They were worried that he was preparing the French army for an attack. In order to arm themselves, they first took over the Hotel des Invalides in Paris where they were able to get muskets.
Explanation:
Answer:
Most religions have an ethical component. Ethics, which is a major branch of philosophy, encompasses right conduct and good life. ... A central aspect of ethics is "the good life", the life worth living or life that is simply satisfying, which is held by many philosophers to be more important than traditional moral codes.
LMK if this helped :)
Both portray gods. Both contain stories of battles. <span>In both cases, the historical truth of the war is in doubt and remains subject to scholarly discussions. </span>Both are epic poems of considerable length. Both books describe only a limited period in a war that in both cases spans a considerably longer period. Both narratives describe individual battles and deaths of various heroes of both sides, military formations, war diplomacy, meetings and discussions among the characters, and the weapons used. Both are very old poems, their exact origins lost in the mist of times.
Answer:
The right choce is:
It feared Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction.
Explanation:
The George W. Bush administration´s main reason for justifying the invasion of Iraq in 2003 was the assumption that the Saddam Hussein´s dictatorship still possessed weapons of mass destruction (chemical weapons), having failed its international obligations to destroy them after the First Gulf War. 9/11 was a very recent event and it was feared those materials could get in the hands of terrorists, according to the line of the US government. After the brief war against the Iraqi army, the US army failed to find those weapons in the regime´s stockpiles.
Public Education. Challenged the rights of Sweatt to attend law school.
