Answer:
John Brown was not justified in his violence in the name of abolition.
Explanation:
The reason for this is that it was murder. It was amazing that he had such strong beliefs but terrorist have strong beliefs. They kill to get their point across however it is MURDER. Innocent lives and families where destroyed because of his ignorance and need to prove a point. John Brown could have taken different actions instead he killed people. This was not justified no matter his situation of slavery.
Brown was courageous and brave but certainly not honorable. Instead he was a coward because he brutally murdered people who disagreed with him and his point of views.
The Anglo-American hunger for Indian lands was the other event that happened in the United States at this time which influenced the support for the Dawes Act.
<h3>What was the Dawes Act?</h3>
It was a federal legislation that was passed to turn the Native Americans into farmers and landowners by providing cooperating families with 160 acres of reservation land for farming or 320 acres for grazing.
As it was intended to give the Native American family head 320 acres of grazing land or 160 acres of farmland, it also have some aims that includes:
- allotment of land
- vocational training
- education
- divine intervention.
The promised acreages were comparable to those promised by the Homestead Act but there were important differences between the two acts.
Here, the Native tribes already controlled the land that was being returned to them at a fraction of the acreage, but they were not accustomed to a life of standardized ranching and agriculture and the lands allotted to them were often unsuitable for farming.
Read more about Dawes Act
brainly.com/question/905111
#SPJ1
<span>Thomas Jefferson led the opposition to the Marshall Court.
Jefferson never backed down from complaining against the judiciary system at
every occasion possible. This was the stand taken by Thomas Jefferson against
Marshall for denouncing it. Whenever the situation demanded Jefferson rose to
the occasion to oppose. Jefferson was a person who believed in giving rights to
the states rather than keeping the power centralised. Jefferson was totally
opposed to the federal government having huge power. He also was opposed to the
idea of supreme court judicial review system. </span>
Answer: France and the U.S
Explanation: This is my first time doing a answer so yeah but i think this is correct
According to my data it will be the first one
