The answer to this really depends on what prism you are viewing it from?
As a globe, we are pretty opposed to imperialism these days. China has started to dabble a little more in the South China Sea but we mostly have our nation states and there isn't really a lot of movement.
That was not the case at the time of annexation.
So, is it ethical to subsume a sovereign nation? No
Was it strategically justifiable at the time? Yes. If the United States had not annexed Hawaii, the Empire of Japan likely would have stepped in.
Hawaii has enormous strategic value and was then justifiable at the time of annexation.
That being said, and I hope this is an obvious statement, imperialism is not a good thing and is ethically problematic.
Answer:
<h2>11 Times</h2>
Explanation:
The congress has formally declared war 11 times. It first declare war against Great Britain in 1812. The last formal declaration of war was during the second world war. The war powers clause ( Article 1, Section 8, clause 11) of the US constitution grants Congress the power to declare war.
Congress is made up of Senate and House of representatives, it can declare war, makes laws, controls taxing, spending policies and interstate, foreign commerce. It can allow the citizens to capture enemy vessels, it can raise army and maintain a Navy.
it did not want the U.S. to be involved in international politics.
Answer: eventually returned to their home countries.
Explanation:
Answer:
1. NATIONAL GRANGE MOVEMENT (1868)
2. INTERSTATE COMMERCE ACT (1886)
3. FARMERS' ALLIANCES
4. OCALA PLATFORM
