MPC stands for "marginal propensity to consume," which refers to a rise in consumer spending for every unit of income level achieved.
Marginal propensity to save (MPS) is the percentage of a person's income that they put away for savings for every unit that their income level rises.
Spending multiplier = Increase in income level for each unit increase in autonomous spending = 1/(1-MPC) = 1/MPS Spending multiplier = Increase in income level for each unit increase in autonomous expenditure. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is a multiplier?</h3>
Generally, the amount by which the return on investment is greater than the investment itself is referred to as the investment's return on investment (ROI).
In conclusion, Marginal propensity to save (MPS) is the percentage of a person's income that they put away for savings for every unit that their income level rises.
Read more about multiplier
brainly.com/question/23536361
#SPJ1
The mass of glucose solute dissolved in the solution is 6.739 Kg.
Recall that;
ΔT = K m i
ΔT = Freezing point depression
K =Freezing point depression constant = 1.86°C/mol
m = molality of the solution
i = Van't Hoff factor = 1 (molecular solution)
We have to find the freezing point depression from;
Freezing point depression = Freezing point of pure solvent - Freezing point of solution
Freezing point of pure water = 0°C
Freezing point of solution = -5. 8 ∘C
Freezing point depression = 0°C - (-5. 8 ∘C) = 5. 8 ∘C
Now;
m = ΔT/K i
m = 5. 8 ∘C/ 1.86°C/mol × 1
m = 3.12 m
But molality = number of moles of solute/mass of solvent in Kg
Molar mass of solute = 180 g/mol
Let the mass of solute be m
3.12 = m/180/12
3.12 = m/180 × 12
m = 3.12 × 180 × 12
m = 6739 g or 6.739 Kg
Learn more: brainly.com/question/6249935
The given statement is False. Baker, Schultz, and Halstead argue that the United States can reap significant strategic and economic benefits by investing in cleaner energy technologies and supporting international efforts to reduce carbon emissions.
Carbon emissions are the primary cause of global climate change. It is widely acknowledged that in order to avoid the worst effects of climate change, the world must urgently reduce emissions. However, how this responsibility is distributed among regions, countries, and individuals has long been a source of contention in international discussions.
This debate stems from the various ways emissions are compared, including annual emissions by country, emissions per person, historical contributions, and whether or not they account for traded goods and services. These metrics can tell a variety of stories.
To know more about carbon emissions here-
brainly.com/question/1301348
#SPJ4
